Gary Schroen's "First In" is a firsthand account of the CIA's role in the early days of the War on Terror in Afghanistan. Schroen was the leader of the CIA's first team into Afghanistan after the 9/11 attacks, and his book provides a detailed and at times gripping account of the CIA's efforts to overthrow the Taliban regime and bring al-Qaeda to justice. While working with the Northern Alliance.
The book is well-written and informative, and Schroen does a good job of bringing the reader into the world of the CIA and the challenges of operating in a war zone. However, the book is also slow-paced, and Schroen's biases for Russians, against Afghans, and against Pakistanis made the book somewhat uneven?
Overall, "First In" is an important and informative book, but it is not without its flaws. I would recommend it to anyone interested in the War on Terror, the CIA (or other major intelligence agencies in general and how field operatives go about getting stuff done)*but* be prepared for a slow read and authors idiosyncrasies (for example he mentioned how he watched the movie Austin Powers while in Afghanistan and how he hated it, how can ANYONE hate Austin Powers???).
Here are some specific examples of actual weirdness:
He frequently expresses appreciation for Russian made items he used in Afghanistan (Helicopter, Trucks, Beer, Binoculars) even though Russians did everything they could to make sure Afghanistan would be a quagmire for Americans. And also because in my experience Russian mass produced things sorta suck (like the Lada cars which are famous for being unreliable).
He also makes some cutting remarks about Pakistan,and how Pakistanis in power have harmed American interests over and over with their short sighted behavior (but goes on to praise them in the book's conclusion).
Despite weirdness, Schroen does provide some insightful observations about Afghan culture and the challenges of operating in a war zone (going on and on about his explosive diarrhea was perhaps a bit TMI?). He also makes a strong case for the importance of human intelligence in the fight against terrorism. I particularly enjoyed the detail he goes into about the preparations the author and his team undertook. Despite the CIA's bureaucratic tendencies (he sorta makes it sound like an episode of The Office). Hand-wringing in the State Department (mostly fueled by misguided Pakistanis who seem to have too much influence on American policy making - according to the author) is also described in clear-eyed terms.
I was quite surprised to learn that US Armed forces were not allowed to fly over Tajikistan or Uzbekistan for quite some time as the war was starting and that this was a major point of consternation as the US needed to land Special Forces in Afghanistan for various tasks that needed to get done. What would Tajikistan and Uzbekistan have done had the flights just flown over without permission (perhaps with fighter jet escorts)? Would they have shot them down? I doubt it. Not when America was out for terrorist blood. So I found myself wishing there were more envelope pushers handling things, it'd obviously cause more international incidents and possibly some minor wars but would get things done! Obviously my very in-expert and more than likely idiotic opinion.
Overall, "First In" is an important and informative book, but it is slow (be warned). And the author's views need to be taken in context of his personality and his long career in the CIA.