To tell the truth, I am not really all that sure how I feel with regard to Enid Blyton’s The Naughtiest Girl in the School, finding both much to appreciate and enjoy about Blyton’s presented narrative, but also considering more than a few aspects of Whyteleafe school rather uncomfortable and problematic with regard to politics and philosophy.
For one, while I actually do think that the “naughty” girl of the title, that young Elizabeth Allen needs to learn quite a few lessons (such as how to make friends, that making up one’s mind should not mean being unwilling to change, and yes indeed, that Elizabeth is definitely rather too spoiled and used to generally getting her own way), considering how easily Elizabeth makes friends with Joan and how readily she wants to and attempts to help her, I personally do not really like the book title of The Naughtiest Girl in the School all that much, as I in fact do not think that Elizabeth is actually all that often deliberately ill mannered and nasty and indeed that often her supposed naughtiness and being in trouble and disgrace at school are actually and in fact more the result of things just happening, of Elizabeth being a bit unlucky, of her trying to do good deeds which end up rather majorly backfiring.
And for two (and also much more of a potential problem for me), while I have certainly often heard it claimed that Enid Blyton’s coeducational Whyteleafe School is supposedly and truly progressive, sorry, but on both an emotional and on an intellectual level, there are serious and not to be taken lightly issues with Enid Blyton seemingly promoting and celebrating collective thinking. For while it might well be progressive to have the students in The Naughtiest Girl series be pretty much self governing, those communal meetings and the students as a group deciding on suitable punishments, not to mention that the entire system of the students being made to deposit their cash allowances into some type of common piggy bank, with everyone receiving the exact same amount every week, in my opinion, that does kind of feel a bit like a foray into Communism (with all of the students being rather the same and also receiving the exact same amounts of money per week, maybe something that would perhaps make life at boarding school easier with all students sharing, with all students being collectively similar, but there is something about this and how much this is celebrated which I definitely consider rather strange and kind of turning students into generic robot like entities).
And therefore, while I have actually still quite enjoyed The Naughtiest Girl in the School, and really do adore Elizabeth Allen as a character, the in my opinion rather overly exaggerated focus on the glory and the benefits of collectivism (and how Enid Blyton really does seem to totally consider this superior to individualism in The Naughtiest Girl series), this does definitely make me more than a trifle uncomfortable (since for me, I do always consider individualism important even if being communal, sharing etc. is also necessary, and yes, the one-sidedness of celebrating collective ideals and behaviours in The Naughtiest Girl in the School, it truly does make me take enough textual issue and umbrage to only consider a very low and grudging three star rating).