The author’s main argument of this book is aiming to engage the interfaith discussion between Jews and Christians by informing Christians of many Jewish roots a lot of Christians are simply unaware of. The claim of the book is that Jesus is not solely the Christian of our own denomination, but primarily a Jew in a Jewish culture, surrounded by Jewish teaching, writing, and thought by many Rabbis of the day. Young aims to inform the reader and Christian of the Jewish context of Jesus’ day to better understand the significance and realm of his teachings.
The audience of this book is mainly geared for Christians who desire to be more educated in Jewish influence and thought in Christianity today. Pastors, teachers, and every day Christians are sought after in order to gain a more proper understanding of Jesus’ Jewish roots, and therefore avoid improperly characterizing Jesus in our Western, Christian, sectarian lenses.
The bias of the author, pretty obviously, tended to credit the Jewish influence highly over any Christian significance of Jesus’ teaching. Giving Jewish credit is clearly the entire premise of the book, but at times can be reading into certain biblical passages and thoughts, to the detriment of Christian thought. For example, his conclusion to the book saying, “Jesus never converted to Christianity” is much farther than I think any Christian would be willing to assert, and by extension his audience (216). This bias towards crediting Jewish thought is aligning with the fact that Dr. Young spent many years studying and teaching in Jerusalem himself.
There are many strengths to this book. I personally learned so much about Jewish thought as a whole. I was just simply never informed about most Jewish thought, and therefore the direct beneficiary of Young’s intended audience with this book. Learning about the Jewish writings of the day and aligning it side by side with Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount was frankly shocking. To think that Jesus’ teachings was not completely original was for some reason very shocking to me, but made me realize still the weight of his teaching in light of the Jewish context. Jesus himself as the fulfiller of the Torah sought still to follow and reform its teaching by going to the heart. This definitely grew my appreciation for the Sermon on the Mount and Jesus’ teaching overall.
Also learning more about the Pharisees and various Jewish sects was shocking. Young claimed that the Pharisees were not public enemy number one, which I don’t know if I completely agree with, but is an interesting thought. I never realized Jesus himself commanded to follow the Pharisees’ teaching, but I still think the author’s bias again played into this section. It is very clear from Jesus all throughout the Gospels that there is hostility, which is warranted and towards the sect of the Pharisees as a whole. Learning about the Jewish writings (Mishnah, Talmud, Gemara, etc.) I also found to be fascinating, because I simply never had learned about it before. Overall, in terms of informing the audience of Jewish roots and context of the day, the author accomplished this goal. This is where I benefitted most from this book.
The weakness of this book lies in, again, at times giving too much credit to Jewish roots, which lies in the author’s bias towards Judaism. Certain claims are read into the text in order to give credit to the Jewish thought of the day (Pharisees friends with Jesus, “Jesus never converted to Christianity,” etc.). While I understand that the aim of this book is to give credit where Christians often lack it, and I appreciate the heart of the author to give credit where its due, I think at times it goes farther than warranted within Scriptural evidence.
Overall, this book was very worthwhile reading, growing my knowledge and appreciation for the Jewish roots and influence on Christian thought and writings. Preparing to go to Israel, this book has grown my desire to learn more and experience the Jewish context in which Jesus lived and walked some two thousand years ago.