"As iron technology is more complicated than bronze, it probably also resulted in the development of specialists and more rigid labour divisions. The impact of these changes upon gender relations has not yet been considered, although the parallels with the impact of contact should now challenge us to explore how these technological changes affected negotiation and transformation of gender relations as new ways of living together came into being" (Sørensen: 179)
This book is about gender archaelogy and it tells you why gender archaelogy is relevant or its evolution as a field of study. I did not get what gender archaelogy really means until page 72 and perhaps this should have happend earlier. Before that the author defines sex and gender, or how women have been so far studied and displayed in archaelogy and museums. A new method of analysis/display is provided, which is great.
The book is written in such a way that I had to reread some paragraphs. I think the problem lies in the syntax, as a few sentences are way too long. The number of references to other scholars was huge in my opinion.
The case studies in the book did not seem to me always revelatory, as most of them haven't been fully explored yet or still need to be investigated. Because they are not fully explored, it is unknown whether a case is the norm or gender-based at all. Chapter 9 was my favourite chapter and I felt chapter 10 was the most assertive one.
The book was written in 2000, when gender archaelogy was probably still not that popular. This is why the book feels so hypothetical and defensive about gender archaelogy. Therefore, an updated version is urgently needed.