First, this book was not on the same level for me as Thomas Savage’s stellar 1967 novel ‘The Power Of The Dog.’ Please read that book, folks - you will not forget it. Second, the Goodreads blurb for ‘The Sheep Queen’ is terribly misleading. Yes, there is a Sheep Queen, Emma Russell Sweringen, and she deserves many accolades for her accomplishments in running a ranch with thousands of acres and thousands of sheep in Idaho in the early 1900’s, but she is not the star of this show. In fact, she causes irrevocable harm to two innocents due to her absolute intractability. Her grandson did not “adore” her as the blurb implies - no one did. This was a woman to be respected, feared, obeyed - not adored: “But Emma’s will and Emma’s influence and Emma’s way of being right - why, Emma was like a brushfire. When you checked her in one place, she flared up over there.” (~ Emma’s husband, Thomas Sweringen) The granddaughter given up for adoption did not “spend half her life finding her way back to her family” - she did not even know who her “real” family was until almost age 50. So far this review is mostly what the book is not. What is it then? you might ask.
It is a detailed family saga with a touch of mystery, the semi-autobiographical history of author Thomas Savage published under a different title in 1977, ten years after ‘The Power Of The Dog.’ The story meanders through multiple timelines and places from the late 1800’s through the mid 1970’s, through Maine, Washington, Montana, Idaho, Utah, and California. It introduces countless characters - Sweringens, Russells, Owens, McKinneys, Brewers, Burtons. At one point, I had to bring out my trusty notepad to organize a character tree. There is the heartbreaking abandonment of one child and the death of another, the dramatic crossing of a longstanding line in the sand, the painful realization that some people are never to be relied upon, and the graceful acceptance of a situation completely beyond imagining. Savage died in 2003 but I would love to ask him just how much of this riveting story is true. I also want to know which version of where Tom Burton spent his mother’s trip to Fraser River is correct - Tom’s or Aunt Roberta’s? Or was this a serious editing faux pas?
No, this book is not ‘The Power Of The Dog,’ but it is a fine novel nonetheless with superior sentences and skillfully nuanced characters. I now need to hunt down more work by this talented and overlooked author. Here are a few samples of his brilliant writing in hopes you’ll give him a try sometime, if you haven’t already:
“You do not so much expect people with silk underwear to get into trouble. Because they do not need to.”
“Hope was more powerful medicine than booze, and left a wicked hangover.”
“I doubt if I would have spoken to her even had I seen her pour whiskey from a bottle, for I knew enough of alcoholics to know they simply deny what your eyes have seen - and then what do you say? Do you say they are not only drunks but liars? You do not. You grieve.”
“Seated people are easier to manage; they have relinquished a dangerous mobility.”
“He told us with his posture that all things pass, that endurance is everything, that we must never forget who we are, that each of us must support the other.” Well said, Mr. Savage, well said.