Pevsner’s book is remarkable: it is short enough and well illustrated, which should make it an easy and accessible read for both the profane eager to find that the modern style did not appear, despite its claims, through divine revelation, but out of a tumultuous historical process, and to those more familiar with the subject, as Pevsner wide ranging knowledge of European and American architecture will have most likely something to teach them.
To this day few writers endeavour to cover both aspects of modernism, that is the technical one and the much more popular ‘cultural’ one: Pevsner adresses both with a certain brio, and unsurprisingly given its early publication, with fairly little secondary sources. He seems just as much at ease with the tracing of concrete and metal use in architecture back to the eighteenth century, as he is taking his reader from Arts & Crafts to Modernism, via Art Nouveau, synthesizing convincingly many aspects and influences, and especially emphasizing those liminal styles like Secession or the work of Hodler which exhibit what others might have deemed incompatibilities form and content. The one thing that could be found lacking is a more in depth look at the politics involved in the battle between historicism and modern style, and in particular on the peculiar ‘neither left nor right’ position of art nouveau. Then again surely the context might easily be blamed for Pevsner not lingering on such sensitive questions.
Last but not least, any lover of modernism will be delighted to read such a history written by a militantly unapologetic “defender of the faith.” Writing in the thirties, at a time where he could still claim with a straight face a status of pioneer for his historical endeavour, the author radiates a candid confidence in the principles of modernist design, in the ‘style of today’ as he likes to call it. Yet already, betraying the nostalgia and conservatism inherent in the grasp of modernism as coherent whole, he feels the need to scold the late comers such as Le Corbusier or Niemeyer, for their deviant, indulgent expressionism. His judgements and evaluations of schools and individuals are virtually reducible to one single scale: how close did their work brought design history to its final, rational and angular apotheosis. He concludes: “[A]rchitects as well as clients must know that today’s reality, exactly as that of 1914, can finds its complete expression only in the style created by the giants of that by now distant past.” In other words, this book is both a landmark for the writing of its history, and for modernism itself!