What do you think?
Rate this book


489 pages, Hardcover
First published October 15, 1988
"The other advantage that we had all along is that the three (or four) of us all write wildly divergent material. We are such different people and we write so differently that it gives us what I like to call a much wider palette out of which to paint the album, much more than most people have...We write an incredible spread of stuff - it's really soup to nuts..."

"...My first impression of David was I had never seen anybody who had that much interest and joy and spontaneous reaction. He was like a child in his willingness to put his feet into it, into everything. He would react to a carving of a boat or a whale or a girl's body or something that somebody had made or music or carpentry or whatever with this joy. You didn't even have to look at what the object was, you could just look at his face and be delighted because there was a human being getting that childlike excitement out of stuff. He did that continuously!"
"David was wonderful company and a great appreciator. When it comes to expressing infectious enthusiam, he is probably the most capable person I know. His eyes were like star sapphires to me. When he laughed, they seemed to twinkle like no one else's and so I fell into his merry company..."
"In my experience, there was never anything quite like the egos in Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young. It was not easy. David was obnoxious, loud, demanding, thoughtless, full of himself - of the four of them, the least talented. And I think that he felt the least talented."
"You want to know how it will be
Me and her, or you and me
You both stand there, your long hair flowing,
Your eyes alive, your mind still growing
"Saying to me what can we do
Now that we both love you
I love you too
And I don't really see
Why can't we go on as three."
"Look, I can't handle it. It's madness."
Using the title of his elegy for RFK as a title for his own autobiography, David Crosby makes a chilling comparison between assassination and freebase addiction.
The “Cros” (as many friends & fans refer to him) tells a tale—with the help of Carl Gottlieb—that is so fraught with reversals that it would probably be dismissed as contrived if it weren’t so well documented in the entertainment media. Cros & Gottlieb contrast their own recollections with quotes from entertainment media and from witnesses who remembered a case in point differently. The effect instills the book with some credibility, which is no small feat considering the unreliability of Cros during the depths of his addiction.
For some readers, the book feels too long. I somewhat understand (how did multiple references to Stills dousing a comatose Cros with ice water make it past the editor? One eyewitness account is sufficient). It’s a long Act II because Cros had both the resources not only to hit bottom but the cunning to tap dance there long after the music had ended. The frustration felt while waiting for his well-known incarceration in Texas gives readers a small sense of the despair Cros’ colleagues must’ve felt.
As a musician, I frequently want more clarification about the specifics of the music. Cros and Joe Walsh give some passing attention to the importance of the middle voice on most of CSN’s songs. There is more to Cros as a musician than the middle harmony. But that’s another book.