Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Post-transitional Justice: Human Rights Trials in Chile and El Salvador

Rate this book
Latin America is still dealing with the legacy of terror and torture from its authoritarian past. In the years after the restoration of democratic governments in countries where violations of human rights were most rampant, the efforts to hold former government officials accountable were mainly conducted at the level of the state, through publicly appointed truth commissions and other such devices. This stage of “transitional justice” has been carefully and exhaustively studied. But as this first wave of efforts died down, with many still left unsatisfied that justice had been rendered, a new approach began to take over. In Post-transitional Justice, Cath Collins examines the distinctive nature of this approach, which combines evolving legal strategies by private actors with changes in domestic judicial systems. Collins presents both a theoretical framework and a finely detailed investigation of how this has played out in two countries, Chile and El Salvador. Drawing on more than three hundred interviews, Collins analyzes the reasons why the process achieved relative success in Chile but did not in El Salvador.

296 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 2010

1 person is currently reading
12 people want to read

About the author

Cath Collins

9 books

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
2 (66%)
4 stars
1 (33%)
3 stars
0 (0%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
1,000 reviews8 followers
March 6, 2015
I read this book as a starting point for what will be a summer in Chile looking at the forms of judicial complaints as accountability measures. I got so caught up in it at one point that I missed by bus stop, but that may say more about me... I'm fundamentally really interested in transitional justice and accountability measures, so this book was obviously interesting for me. It is one of the first I've read that unapologetically prefers judicial accountability over other transitional justice mechanisms. I felt that it often discredited truth-telling - or at least didn't adequately address why criminal trials were preferable (ie. who's version of justice are we measuring).
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.