"The richest treasures are those we create in our minds, where they endure untarnished and immutable... Do we really want to discover the mortal remains of history's most immortal son?" (Saunders, 204-205).
Wow! I have so many thoughts about this book and mixed emotions overall.
First off, Saunders' writing style is up and down for me. When reading his occasional explanations and further reflections on the topic, I am astounded by his passion for archaeology and preserving history. His interpretations help the reader put things into perspective while leaving them with something to think deeply about. I have underlined so many sentences in this book for this reason. However, when laying out the history (which comprised most of this book), the language is very academic and advanced and might be too confusing for the average reader who knows surface-level information on the topic. For instance, the author gives a brief background of a historical figure, then never mentions who they are again, which can get confusing.
There is definitely a need for historical authors to balance their writing and word choice to suit both academics and the average person. However, this struggle is essential because history must be shared with everyone, so it faltered in that sense. Despite that, Saunders clearly did his research because this book is filled with information, facts, and lots of sources (which I greatly appreciated)!
Furthermore, the reader must have some background in Egypt, the Ptolemaic Period, the Roman Imperial Period, Napoleon's conquests, and beyond to understand the whole premise. This isn't really a historical pleasure read but rather an in-depth, detailed academic piece. It took me a while to read this, partially because I kept putting it down because it was so dense. It seemed like it was fact after fact, and it needed more explanation to break things up a bit.
Ultimately, I gave this book four stars (3.5 rounded up). I did learn quite a lot from it. As someone with a background in the ancient world, Egypt, Classical studies, Hellenism, and archaeology, I could somewhat understand the concepts, but to the average person, this might be too challenging to digest. I could sort of read between the lines and get what Saunders was saying. Nonetheless, I did learn many things, such as the origins of the Mausoleum of Halicarnassus and the British Museum's reason for obtaining stolen antiquities. I wish it could be more readable so the topic could reach a wider audience because it really is an exciting topic that has the potential to generate a larger interest in the public.