I'll look like hell, just to wear it well / I'll believe the stories that I tell, if it weaves a spell (Breathe – Dom Fera).
I believe congratulations from me to me are in order. Congrats me, you finished an old ass book that was super long and you actually liked it, no bullshit! Nice job, me! I'm in the building and I'm feeling myself. Hey, you know what? Maybe I should go back and finish the Game of Thrones books now that I know I’m capable of diving into classic, overly complicated fantasy without yawning the whole way through. Well, I think I'll stick to the Nightrunner series for now because at least the author finished it. But please allow me to brag about one more thing; I can give you a synopsis without having to look up character names! No glossary, no nothing, I just straight up know things! I know Seregil and Alec are as fun a duo to ever have been put to… page, I know Micum is the first “family man" man character that I’ve actually given a shit about, and I definitely know that I didn’t like Nysander based solely off of vibes alone (I spent this whole book thinking he was secretly a villain). But let me put on my official Synopsis Cap™; Luck in the Shadows is a book set in a sprawling fantasy world full of deep lore and intricate political machinations where we follow a young man named Alec as he goes from helplessly being saved from torture by super spy Seregil to being taken under his wing and tutored in the ways of his exciting life. Things quickly go from complicated to… complicated-er as they soon find themselves embroiled in a plot that could shake the very foundations of their society. “War! The Republic is crumbling under attacks by the ruthless Sith Lord, Count Dooku. There are heroes on both sides. Evil is everywhere.” and all that. Sorry, I know that this is sounding suspiciously like an advertisement, but this book is just a good time all around and it’s hard for me to not to get excited while I’m talking about it. Here’s the thing, I’ve always been a bit of a vintage loving hipster dude, but it’s been especially prevalent with me in the recent months. I’ve been diving into a bunch of old books (hence this review that I’m writing right now), to the point where I’ve been seriously debating whether or not I should read a couple Nancy Drew books, I had a panic moment a while back when I noticed I don’t actually own any of my favorite movies and shows, so I went out and got physical copies of every season of Better Call Saul, and finally, I’ve been playing a bunch of old ass video games because all the new ones are upwards of 70 dollars now. And moving past my run-on sentences, the most recent game I’ve played is this old gem called Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands that's all about the titular prince trying to save his brother from succumbing to a cursed amulet. Sound familiar? Luck in the Shadows is a book that’s also all about Seregil almost dying because he thought that the move was to put on a cursed amulet. My bad for all the "cursed amulet" talk, I just really enjoy whenever they're used as a plot point because, yeah, they're a smart way of showing the reader an "evil" version of the main character, but also because I just think they're really funny. I just know in my heart of hearts that I'd succumb to the evil influence faster than has ever been seen before! So yeah, cursed amulets? They’re making a big comeback!
But on a more serious note, one of my favorite things about this book is actually probably a lot of other people’s strongest points of contention, in that… this book is really long and several different plot-lines would constantly gets twisted in knots to the point where it can be really easy to get lost as to where the story is going. Wait, let me try that again, because I don’t think I described that in the most flattering of ways. It's like how I've never wanted to play games like Dark Souls or Elden Ring (call your mom, because her phone seldom rings) because people always describe them as "so challenging that you'll literally want to pull your hair out!" and I'm always thinking, okay, so why would I want to play them, then? So yeah, this book isn't long and the story doesn't get twisted in knots, Luck in the Shadows is simply a detailed and immersive story that respects the reader enough that it doesn't feel the need to hold our hands! Is that better? I really do think that these aspects of the story are what kept me drawn to the book, nonetheless. One of my favorite things to do in these reviews is to tell you what my favorite things are, and I’ve got to say… one of my favorite things out there is this book series called The Extraordinary Adventures of the Athena Club (it also has my favorite iteration of Sherlock Holmes) by Theodora Goss, and the second book in the series, European Travel for the Monstrous Gentlewoman, is similar to Luck in the Shadows in that they’re both really long-winded… like, we’re talking seven hundred pages kind of long-winded. And I get why a lot of people don’t like that, I really do, but because I loved the characters so much, I would have gladly read a million pages just following their adventures! I know that the characterizations of Seregil (whose full title is such a complicated string of letters that I won't dare repeat here lest I accidentally summon the Babadook or something) and Alec are a bit more understated in the personality department than most readers are used to, what with a lot of modern fiction having a larger emphasis on snark and quips, but I still think that they’re given more than enough depth to make them stand out amongst any of my favorite characters any day. In fact, the book threw a couple curve balls at me, because even though I was expecting Alec and Seregil’s dynamic to start out as the classic “mentor and student” type relationship, I was actually relieved to see that they were actually more on even ground than you’d think at first glance. This is shown through Seregil’s character flaws of jealously and immaturity being especially highlighted or in how frequently Alec ends up being the one to save the day despite the fact that he’s the one who’s supposed to be learning from the former. In fact, I even started tallying up the score after a while, because damn, by the halfway point, Seregil save Alec maybe once in the beginning while Alec was saving Seregil’s ass left and right. Five times, but who’s counting? Think of them as more like Obi-Wan with Anakin rather than Obi-Wan with Luke. Bickering like family, but you know they love each other at the end of the day.
“I don’t know how many times a day I can stand to watch you almost die.”
“Twice is my limit.”
Hey, and even though this bad boy is strictly within the confines of the high fantasy, it's always a bit of fun to read books that are a bit more fluid and expansive with its genre, and I really enjoyed the horror elements that were sprinkled here and there. It’s nothing too crazy, and I am a bit of a scaredy-cat, so take whatever I say with a grain of salt, but this book really scratched that specific "light horror" itch. I mean, the things that have always frightened me have been a bit more low-key than fantastical, and even as a kid, things like Chucky or It outside of Pennywise never really got to me all that much. It was always the more existential human stuff like in literally any episode of The Twilight Zone (I still can't watch the show if I want sleep to find me that night). Hell, I specifically remember when I was suuu~uuper young watching 12 Angry Men with my parents and getting freaked out whenever the camera would abruptly switch to close ups of the actors yelling (which is basically the whole movie)! It was just too spooky a concept for me, I guess. Like “ahhh there’s twelve men!! And they’re angry!!” you know how it is. So yeah, even though this was probably the weakest part of the book, I was still really digging it when Seregil was in his cursed amulet era, acting out of character and all that, because it reminded me of that specific kind of character study type horror story. Anyway, I guess I’ve got time for another little story. Well, it’s less a “story” and more confession… but I’ve actually been under the impression that I’ve kind of just hated long-form fantasy for the past year or so because I couldn’t get into Baldur’s Gate 3, the very popular and critically acclaimed video game, Baldur’s Gate 3. And I tried! Oh, I tried to get into it. The beautiful graphics, the gayness! I thought it’d be right up my alley! But nah, it wasn’t my thing and I'm still disappointed. I hated how the camera was always, like, a hundred feet in the air so I couldn’t see my character, I hated having to roll a dice every time the game wanted me to make a decision, I hated how every time I wanted to open a chest for a cool weapon or armor piece I had to backtrack through a million missable steps along the way, and most importantly, I hated the millions of complicated menus that you have to sift through just to do anything! Seriously, my version of hellish purgatory would be spending eternity in the grassy planes of Baldur’s Gate 3’s opening area! I really do like the game’s story though, so I’ll probably just watch a playthrough. By the way, this is why I like reading so much, because I can just sit back and enjoy the story without having to literally do stuff myself. They call me Passive Perry. Anyway, the way Lynn Flewelling manages to weave together so many detailed and intricate story threads while also finding a perfect balance between character development and world-building is nothing short of a miracle. But maybe that’s not fair, because claiming that Luck in the Shadows being perfect blend of fantasy goodness is due to luck might diminish the author’s masterful skill in crafting this book.
Continuing off of my endless praise for a minute, and forgive my musings, but man… they just don’t make many stories like this anymore. You know, where the fantasy elements are presented so earnestly to the reader without any need to add “self-aware” Marvel movie quips that undercuts any sense of wonder or awe that could otherwise be had in the story. Luck in the Shadows may be about spies that have to use their wits and skills in deceit to survive and navigate throughout this dangerous world, but there’s absolutely nothing dishonest about the way the story is presented to us. I always think it’s really interesting to read old fantasy like this because at this point it’s not just a way for me to see into another fantasy world, but it’s also become a way of examining the past in comparing and contrasting how differently people interact with the genre “That Was Then and This is Now” style! Because while gay fantasy can be found in abundance today, in terms of books where queer characters are front and center in the story and exist outside of being props, I really do think that Luck in the Shadows was a trendsetter. And it’s funny because I actually think a lot of push-back towards high fantasy, queer or otherwise, has always had an implicit foundation in bigotry. Okay, hang with me for a second, but whenever there’s a large hate campaign against something that’s constantly stated as being “lame” or “uncool,” I think it’s important to look at the origins of that hate and who it benefits. For example, in the 1980’s there was an immense pop-culture push-back against the rise of disco (“Don't try to take me to a disco, you'll never even get me out on the floor”) and the truth is that because disco was created by and for queer people, black people, and queer black people, I’d argue that the hatred towards the music genre was actually rooted in anti-blackness and queerphobia. But if we’re sticking closer to the topic at hand, the fantasy genre, there’s the whole cultural zeitgeist surrounding the Lord of the Rings movies. It's easy to forget because every dude loves them now, but when those movies came out there were a lot of people who would constantly try and harp on the movies for being “gay” in a derogatory sense due to the fact that they’re movies that blatantly wear their heart on a sleeve. There was even a commercial that featured Frodo and Sam with the song “Secret Lovers” playing over the top in a “ ha ha gay people suck” kind of way. Sheesh... tough times. So, what’s my point? Um, I just think that it’s always important to look at these stories within the context in which they were created, and I’m trying to convey exactly why this book touched me the way that it did. Sure, it shows its age, but I still loved Luck in the Shadows because it's a kick ass story that understands that it’s kick ass to be earnest as fuck.
I'll lose my mind, 'cause it's nice to find / But I’ll see the sights and take my time, to be sure it’s mine.