“For God’s sake, Westcliffe, I’ve asked for forgiveness, which you withhold, and I’ve told you that I wish to be your wife in all matters. Why must you make this so blasted difficult?” “Because I no longer want you for my wife.” Lady Claire Michaels married Morgan Lyons, Earl of Westcliffe, three years ago. But it's a marriage in name only, because on their wedding night, Westcliffe was furious to discover his wife with his younger brother on their wedding bed. Enraged, he banished Claire to his country estate while he decided to live in town. Now three years had passed, and Westcliffe is surprised to find Claire in his house. She's demanding a season for her sister, and she wants to be his wife, not only in name, but to be an actual wife to him! Claire is quite aware of her husband's reputation and his illicit trysts. But in the years that passed, she was no longer that young girl who feared her husband, now she is determined to make their marriage work. But how could it be possible when her husband no longer trusts her and wanted nothing to do with her?
Passions of a Wicked Earl is another book from Lorraine Heath. Recently, I’ve been liking her stories and the way she writes so I gave this one a chance. While I am not very disappointed, I am not very satisfied with what I’ve read either. This book tells the story of a scandalous dowager duchess’s first son, Morgan Lyons and his disgraced wife, the countess.
Meet Claire, Lady Westcliffe, she was a young girl who had always been promised to Morgan Lyons. In their young age, they knew that they would eventually marry each other. She had always been closer to Stephen instead, Westcliffe’s younger brother. But the love they feel for each other is what one would feel for a sibling. On her wedding night, Claire lets Stephen know that she is afraid of her husband and what goes on in the marriage bed. And with that, they hatched a plan to delay the inevitable. Not quite knowing what she agreed to, and with too much champagne in her system, Claire and Stephen was caught by Westcliffe. Not doing the act, but they were together on a bed alone, which is very scandalous back then. So no, she is no cheater but simply a young girl who was afraid and unsure.
Morgan Lyons, Earl of Westcliffe, had been looking forward to his marriage with Claire. It was something done out of duty but also because of the glimpses he sees when she’s with Stephen. So, it was quite understandable that he was furious when he discovered her and his younger brother, in what should’ve been his position. He is a very insecure person. When his father, the Earl, died, her mother married a duke. Even when he’s the eldest in the trio, he’s been insecure because his youngest sibling, Ainsley, is more powerful and wealthy. Westcliffe’s marriage to Claire is something that would give him freedom and allow him to be his own man, especially since his wife’s dowry is quite a lot. So, we get that he was looking forward to that and fulfilling his husbandly duties. His mother always loved his siblings best. He thinks that in his marriage to Claire, there’d be someone who’ll come to care for him which is more reason why he felt very betrayed when he discovered her with Stephen instead.
I loved the heroine. I honestly think she deserved better. Though she had her dumb moments, I appreciated her strength and how she owned up to her mistakes and is genuinely trying to do better. Trying to make her marriage work even when she knows it would take a while. She was naive so what she did on her wedding night was understandable, however dumb. She was a young girl! Barely out of school room. She had been young and foolish. What I loved about her was that she held her head high, and did not let herself appear foolish in front of other people when she was finally in London. She stood up for herself and defended her husband, even when she knows his reputation is quite scandalous. She loved her sister very much too. She’s a good person and a good heroine. I loved getting to know her. There were moments when she made my eyes roll, seriously, she deserved better! But there was something about her that I loved. She was very tender to the hero even when he does not deserve it.
I had a hate-ok relationship with the hero but more hate than anything. He is a sorry excuse of a hero. I hated him. The heroine deserved better! He was an asshole. I hated that he was ready to divorce his wife, however taboo it was, because of a mistress that he does not even love? Like, Sir, are you actually thinking right now? He was so foolish. Hated him. Seriously! The heroine deserved so much better. I think that it would be better if he and his mistress ran away together and rotted in hell. He was so dumb and insecure. Well of course, I would not have preferred that, I would’ve been angrier if that happened. Now for the things I loved about him… actually there is nothing. I am thinking right now and there is actually nothing that comes to mind. I understand that he felt betrayed but for him to banish his wife the second time around? It was unforgivable and I can’t quite understand how it was Claire who tried to make amends the second time. There was no groveling in his part! It was Claire who put in all the effort to make their marriage work. There is nothing about him that’s redeemable. I usually love my tortured heroes but this one? Absolutely disliked him.
Their HEA is not believable to me. The ending felt very rushed. I do not believe that the man’s trust issues would suddenly go away. I think they would be very miserable with each other in the long run. She was so understanding and treated him so good, trying to make up for the past, and while I loved the parts where the readers get to see them falling in love and be nicer to each other, I felt very sad for the heroine when he did not bother listening to her explanation and decided to do the same thing he did three years ago. It was just unforgivable to me. And it shows that he did not trust her enough. What is love and relationship without trust? It would be nothing, it would crumble and they would make each other miserable and wish they married other people instead.
Overall, it was underwhelming. I love Lorraine Heath and her writing style but sadly this book did not work for me. It just bothered me that he seemed to care a great deal for his mistress then all of a sudden he decides he loves his wife. Just no. I love couples that put in the same amount of effort to make the marriage work. I love when they’re devoted to each other and this one is just not the coupe I am looking for in my romance books. Kind of confused if I should give this book 2.5 stars or 3. Because it is not deserving of 2 stars, however it's not quite a 3.. It was written well, it’s just that I hated the hero.
"Only she wanted so much more: love, respect, trust. She wanted him to want her to be his wife again, only she had no idea how to gain that."
"At the time, she’d thought only of her own fears and needs. How little she’d known about Westcliffe. How much more she was coming to know."
"His words humbled her. He’d no doubt expected her laughter to fill his house once they were wed. “I didn’t know,” she finally said, devastated by all that he’d revealed. “I didn’t know you watched, I didn’t know… I didn’t know you.”
"If he’d not turned to anger, he might have wept at the sweetness of the gesture. He had fought so long to be strong, not to need anyone, especially anyone in his own family—because they always seemed to disappoint—and yet, there he was finding himself needing Claire. And that awareness terrified him, made him more vulnerable than he desired to be."
Oh this one was so sweet...“But I want so much more. When your dog is dying, I want you to come to me, tell me, let me share the sorrow with you. When you have bad news, I want to know so I can share the worry or can help you find a way to make it all better. You don’t have to do everything alone, Westcliffe. It’s why I’m here. Not only to be beneath you, but to be beside you.”