What do you think?


Habermas and the Public Sphere
In this book, scholars from a wide range of disciplines respond to Habermas's most directly relevant work, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. The relationship between civil society and public life is in the forefront of contemporary discussion. No single scholarly voice informs this discussion more than that of Jürgen Habermas. His contributions have shaped the nature of debates over critical theory, feminism, cultural studies, and democratic politics. In this book, scholars from a wide range of disciplines respond to Habermas's most directly relevant work, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. From political theory to cultural criticism, from ethics to gender studies, from history to media studies, these essays challenge, refine, and extend our understanding of the social foundations and changing character of democracy and public discourse. Contributors
Hannah Arendt, Keith Baker, Seyla Benhabib, Harry C. Boyte, Craig Calhoun, Geoff Eley, Nancy Fraser, Nicholas Garnham, Jürgen Habermas, Peter Hohendahl, Lloyd Kramer, Benjamin Lee, Thomas McCarthy, Moishe Postone, Mary P. Ryan, Michael Schudson, Michael Warner, David Zaret
Hannah Arendt, Keith Baker, Seyla Benhabib, Harry C. Boyte, Craig Calhoun, Geoff Eley, Nancy Fraser, Nicholas Garnham, Jürgen Habermas, Peter Hohendahl, Lloyd Kramer, Benjamin Lee, Thomas McCarthy, Moishe Postone, Mary P. Ryan, Michael Schudson, Michael Warner, David Zaret
498 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1992
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12 reviews
January 30, 2012
I only read a few of the articles in this collection, but they seemed like good companion pieces to Jurgen Habermas' The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, adding depth, detail, and complication to both Habermas' theories and general ideas about the public sphere.
As with all edited collections or anthologies, the styles and the quality of these articles varied significantly. Some I really liked, for instance Nancy Fraser's article raised some really good counter-points about Habermas'assumptions regarding the public sphere.
As with all edited collections or anthologies, the styles and the quality of these articles varied significantly. Some I really liked, for instance Nancy Fraser's article raised some really good counter-points about Habermas'assumptions regarding the public sphere.
Read
January 25, 2011I got bored.
October 5, 2023
A great, comprehensive, starting point for developing an understanding and critique of Habermas' public sphere. I read roughly half the articles, of which I found Calhouns introduction, Habermas' Further Reflections and the essays of Fraser and Eley most informative. Would definitely recommend to anyone studying early Habermas.
March 30, 2026
rip habermas :(
September 25, 2020
This book looks good in a dissertation reference list.
September 26, 2007
an edited volume of reactions to habermas' transformation of the public sphere. fraser's feminist critique is the most interesting.
Read
October 1, 2008Some of the chapters are interesting.
September 26, 2009
cultural theory
Read
June 1, 2012Read partly but intensively for school.
July 27, 2012
Note particularly Fraser's chapter. Subaltern regroupment, multiple public spheres, etc...
March 10, 2014
Didn't like it at all.
January 22, 2023
ISU: Independent Study
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12 reviews










