Stephen Toulmin argues that the potential for reason to improve our lives has been hampered by a serious imbalance in our pursuit of knowledge. The centuries-old dominance of rationality has diminished the value of reasonableness. Toulmin issues a powerful call to redress the balance between rationality and reasonableness.
One of my favorite books. Gives a compelling and persuasive narrative explaining our traditional neglect of practical reasoning (in favor of abstract reasoning, theorizing, and quantitative modeling). Argues for a reversal of privilege, favoring action research, situated action, and applied reasoning. These are foundational ideas that should be well received in the practical arts such as teaching, nursing, medicine, architecture, and business.
Again (like Kosmopolis) a very rich book. If Kosmopolis was the yin, than this is the yang. Very roughly said, Toulmin describes in this book the process of the 'return to reason' after the death of (modern) philosophy.
With reason, Toulmin means a balanced position generated out of the here and the now, in stead of being generated from the infinite theoretical, rational Truth generated by the 17th century Cartesian/Newtonian methodological system. In this process (in stead of in a deterministic way) the moral component becomes significant. Therefor Toulmin uses the model of a Clinical practice to clarify this process.
Return to reason pleads for revalueing the importance of the Greek 'metis', closely translated in the French 'métier', which contains actions that are not describable by means of language, but purely based on experience and discipline.
Reason is the way to make decisions in the here and the now, based on the balanced combination of ideals and reality. It pleads for taking charge of our free will to actively form our future independent of the unexpected events which can occur. The latter we don't have control on, but we can choose to aim for a reasonable goals to work towards, every day again.
Both Kosmopolis and this book were fundamental in forming my view on modern philosophy. Both books connect the historical context with the evolution of the philosophical/academical process over the last 400 years. Therefor 5 stars for both books.