Laura Ahern’s “Invitations to Love” is an excellent read, particularly for those new to cultural or linguistic anthropology. She addresses he key terms, arguments, and history over the first three chapters of the book, before delving into the meat of her research.
The first chapter provides grounding for understanding the location and political climate of the Magars as an ethnic group in Nepal. It also gives an overview of the changes in gender and literacy, which are expanded upon in the latter parts of the book. The second chapter is used to place Ahearn in the social life of the village, and to explain her methods and their limitations. This chapter is very well done, in that it provides a backdrop to the researcher and her interactions with the village. The third chapter outlines her key terms.
The most important concepts for this book are right in the title: Literacy, love, and social change. Her framework for literacy is a must read, because it informs us about the entirety of the book. She states that she is in favor of dealing with literacy not in the autonomous model, which suggests that all the societies will exhibit the same changes brought about by literacy, but on the ideological model which looks at the specific effects of literacy in a given population. This flavors her later interpretations, as they are consistently aimed only at creating an understanding of this group, rather than an understanding of literacy as whole. This argument is not explicitly touched on throughout the book, but is implicit in many areas.
Social change is of course the core of this work. While this is an apparently transparent concept, it is less well defined when you are actually looking for it, and what constitutes an actual change. For this Ahearn turns to Raymond Williams, who’s concept of “structures of feelings” is used by Ahearn. It is the changes in the thoughts and emotions of the individuals that create a discord with the structures of society, (keeping in mind that structures can of course be in flux as well) that delineate the idea of social change. This change is also not necessarily a rebellion against the existing structures, but change in perceptions relating to them. This foundation serves the work well, and being able to internalize and apply this concept elsewhere would likely be a boon for anyone else doing similar work.
Ahearn supports her argument’s for change by looking at love letters, participant observation and analyzing texts brought into the village by the school and other development efforts. She draws most heavily on her interactions and observations to provide the basis for her analysis of the letters themselves. The letters and other written work are a key aspect of the evidence, however, there is a preponderance of other material addressed that also reflect the changes Ahearn is looking at. I get the impression that this book could have been almost written without the use of the letters at all. That is of course blasphemous, where would a book on societal changes due to literacy be without examples of written production?
Not all of the evidence presented is qualitative, chapter 4 being dedicated to a quantitative approach: A survey tracking marriage trends over time. I found this useful, as without it I’d have been left wondering at the relative scale of these changes.
Overall this was an excellent read, both because of it’s persuasiveness and the overall dedication put into it’s production. It’s incredibly thorough in many regards, and the places where it is not are well delineated.