What do you think?


Exploring Requirements: Quality Before Design
TITLE : Exploring Requirements- Quality Before Design AUTHOR : Donald C. Gause & Gerald M. Weinberg FORMAT : Hardback Book PUBLISHER : Dorset House Publishing DATE : 1989 About 7" x 10" 300
320 pages, Hardcover
First published September 1, 1989
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 10 of 10 reviews
January 17, 2016
A very informative book. The writing style is similar to other Weinberg books, so even though the subject matter is serious, in my case work related it is an easy and enjoyable read. The summaries at at the end of each chapter form a useful cliff notes version that I plan to return to.
October 24, 2016
This is not an actively bad book. It has some good stuff, especially about thinking outside the box, even about an inside the box problem. But, for a heavyweight subject, it is quite lightweight despite the middleweight package.
The authors were consultants at the time they put this together, not lead (or rank and file) requirements developers. It shows not only by the artificial examples, but especially by the repetitive and blatant references to one of the co-author's other books (as opposed to many of the excellent books in the bibliography). This is sales pitch more than a text. I'm not ticked off myself. I only paid a buck for a barely used edition and I have the time since I am retired. But I did requirements analysis and development for a number of years, I find reason to suspect the previous owner of my copy was stuck with this as a course text, and I think she got much less than she paid for.
The authors were consultants at the time they put this together, not lead (or rank and file) requirements developers. It shows not only by the artificial examples, but especially by the repetitive and blatant references to one of the co-author's other books (as opposed to many of the excellent books in the bibliography). This is sales pitch more than a text. I'm not ticked off myself. I only paid a buck for a barely used edition and I have the time since I am retired. But I did requirements analysis and development for a number of years, I find reason to suspect the previous owner of my copy was stuck with this as a course text, and I think she got much less than she paid for.
April 4, 2026
9/10
Old, but absolutely GOLD
Great for designers and product managers. (even project managers)
Old, but absolutely GOLD
Great for designers and product managers. (even project managers)
March 29, 2020
Good basic overview of requirement exploring techniques.
Read
December 26, 2016I confess I have not been disciplined enough to forge through much of this. What I have read of it has shown potential and this is an important topic for IT work of course.
November 1, 2007
You can't tell right away, but almost immediately you know this book is dated. Ignoring the amusing clip art, the fact that the author has to spell out "electronic mail" is a big clue.
Nevertheless, there is some use to this, but much of it is elementary. The advantage to the book is that it helps you check yourself and your team for bad patterns. Much of the content is stuff you probably assume you are doing right, but that it does not hurt to check.
Skip to the "generating ideas" section, however, if you want a good laugh - there may be a suggestion involving silly hats. *sigh*
Nevertheless, there is some use to this, but much of it is elementary. The advantage to the book is that it helps you check yourself and your team for bad patterns. Much of the content is stuff you probably assume you are doing right, but that it does not hurt to check.
Skip to the "generating ideas" section, however, if you want a good laugh - there may be a suggestion involving silly hats. *sigh*
March 10, 2014
First 100 pages are good for structuring that you already know, but next 160 are dated, last paragraph also worth to read. Good book for speed-reading
May 2, 2014
When I read this book, it opened my eyes and began a change in my career. I've reread it a couple of times since then. Highly informative and eminently readable.
Read
January 13, 2018A collection of methods for requirements analysis with an emphasis on identifying missing requirements.
Displaying 1 - 10 of 10 reviews









