An absolute gem of a skillfully crafted play/book that is intellectual and thought provoking, yet surprisingly funny at times. Though its anachronistic elements and philosophical dialogue can leave you confused at times, they also make this one of the most fascinating works you’ll ever read.
Now, you really do need to have somewhat of a sufficient understanding of ancient Roman history, customs, writers and philosophy in order to see where our characters’ views and behavior come from. More importantly: to be able to follow their chain of thought when they discuss the(ir life in the) prison tower, the (in)possibility of escape, and (their nostalgia of) the city of Rome that surrounds the tower.
It’s not all ancient stuff though: the setting is quite modern and technologically advanced, and modern philosophy was an inspiration for, most notably, the panopticon-like prison tower that forms more than just the setting of the story.
Some might become a little fed up (I don’t believe the work could ‘bore’ one, just confuse one…) with the work since its setting doesn’t change, we only ever ‘observe’ two characters and it’s quite ‘unexciting’ in the sense that not that much action takes place. However, as the audience/reader, we are precisely meant to crawl into this role of invisible (and to the characters oppressive) observer. Simultaneously, we’re intentionally given a momentary experience of the maddening, monotonous and displaced life Publius and Tullius are forced to live out in this confined space that is not so much a physical torture, but a psychological one.
Marbles is a complex work that even has personal layers of Brodsky himself to it. Moreover it is heavily marked by ideology and memory (existential memory, and fame). I shan’t repeat the academic essay I wrote on this exact topic, but I will direct you to the works of Yana Meerzon and Sergey Zhilyakov (two sources I consulted) if you wish to learn more about Marbles’ contents. This is especially recommended if you struggled to understand the ending.