There is No Such Thing as a Natural Disaster is the first comprehensive critical book on the catastrophic impact of Hurricane Katrina on New Orleans. The disaster will go down on record as one of the worst in American history, not least because of the government's inept and cavalier response. But it is also a huge story for other reasons; the impact of the hurricane was uneven, and race and class were deeply implicated in the unevenness.
Hartman and. Squires assemble two dozen critical scholars and activists who present a multifaceted portrait of the social implications of the disaster. The book covers the response to the disaster and the roles that race and class played, its impact on housing and redevelopment, the historical context of urban disasters in America and the future of economic development in the region. It offers strategic guidance for key actors - government agencies, financial institutions, neighbourhood organizations - in efforts to rebuild shattered communities.
If you only read one book about Hurricane Katrina and its aftermath, this might be the one you should choose.
Each chapter explores in depth one aspect of the Gulf Coast before, during, and after the hurricane. After reading almost exclusively Katrina books & articles for the past month or two, I was surprised to find three very different chapters especially insightful: One on the much discussed topic of race, the one on the overlooked issue of the storm's impact on the elderly (holy shit), and one on the often protested but rarely explained subject of why and how one must fight for both low-income housing rights and ecological justice in neighborhoods where subsidized/low-income houses were marginalized onto land below sea level and polluted with toxic sludge. The chapter on oral history included some powerful quotes, but I wish it had spent less time naval gazing the idea of oral history and more time letting survivors tell their stories.
This anthology is very academic and kind of dry, but I found it compelling anyway. The main problem is that since each author focuses their chapter on one specific subject, the book comes off disjointed. You get a lot of "The hurricane affected [insert one identity here] worse than everyone else." And in a book that examines the racist structural causes of disaster, it was ridiculous to find the chapter on medicine repeatedly deny that any disparate medical treatment statistics after the hurricane were the result of racism. Come on now!
Other topics included public education, economic recovery plans, poverty and class, and gender. Aside from a deep analysis of New Orleans, this "before and after" approach on such a range of subjects acts as a good case study for issues that are pretty ubiquitous in US cities. It sorted out the big picture into smaller, more easily understood little pictures.
Very cool disaster theory concepts discussed here, but wayyyyyy to wordy and academic. Making these ideas accessible to the layman is how these ideas can get spread, understood, and implemented.
An interesting discussion of the purpose and challenges of oral history. A critic of the media coverage of the aftermath of the hurricanes. The most useful essay was the one that deals with age and the elderly.
a must read book for all those who wants to understand how disaster can affect people of different backgrounds in one of the most developed country in the world 'America'.