I did enjoy this book better than the 1st one of the series - the detailed plot, the brooding family, the Bennett character, like a rich great uncle perhaps. And where has his own daughter gone that he is now doting over Grace?
There's a battle reenactment on the manor grounds.
I figured out whodunit for one of the situations before the protagonist. I missed the major clue of the name in passing. I couldn't remember that detail to get the 2nd whodunit.
Alhough they consider one character verifiably intelligent, they seem to be confusing a logical intelligence with a relational (manipulative) intelligence. Those are different things. Just because someone excels in one does not mean that person would excel in the other.
Also, a separate issue is just because someone may have a relational intelligence does not mean they will twist it negatively into manipulation. I've known relationally intelligent people who have refused to sink to such a level. In fact, I will go so far as to say, if someone is using manipulation, then that person is not relationally savvy at all because of the high emotional and relational costs of manipulation - bitterness, resentment, withdrawal, anger. It does not have a net positive relational aspect, and relationally savvy people do well in avoiding it.
"I needed to get away for awhile. To get my head straight. Before I talked to you." As an introvert, that seems perfectly natural to me for Jack to say this, rather than the big drama Grace made it out to be. After all, he did say he would eventually talk it through with her. Of course, she did have a valid point that he should've at least told her he was ok. There is a middle ground there they can work towards.
At least one other reviewer said Grace should just drop "the emotionally unavailable" Jack, and yes, I did have that thought as well. At one point, he seemed to go too far in his "emotionally unavailability," and I thought that since he is wanting space, she should grant it, and if their relationship withers, then it withers. This is a new relationship without much vested interest, as opposed to a committed marriage where the spouses have committed to working through things. They could come up with their own middle ground, or style of working through things ... or not and break up. Shrug.
"You don't have to do that, you know... Always try to cheer me up. I'm not blind or always feeling sorry for myself." I have to agree with him. Sometimes it feels glibe for someone to be too cheerful over our struggles. "Like one who takes away a garment in cold weather, And like vinegar on soda, Is one who sings songs to a heavy heart." - Proverbs 25:20.
It isn't a virtuous thing to always be cheerful. Sometimes it's inappropriate.
"I've got news for you. A lot of people don't know what they're doing. Some of us just hide it better than others." As someone who's changed careers away from what I've mostly trained to do, this one resonated with me.
"I often feel as though I'm living two lives. One is the facade that everyone sees, and the other is trying desperately to make that facade come true."
I know most people feel this way. I've spent a great deal of time, thought, and effort over decades into making my inner and outer life the same, that what people see is still me through and through. I may not say everything I know - I don't unnecessarily antagonize people - but I am still the same.
There is a tweak that would make this easier for the character. Trying to make parts of her personhood a reality is called having aspirations, a good thing. Just acknowledge that those are aspirations and that they've not been perfected yet. That brings the inner and the outer character more into alignment than otherwise, than hypocrisy would. It acknowleges both the good desires and that she's a work in progress. That's refusing to hide behind a mask pretending more progress has been made towards the aspirations than is really there.