The CliffsNotes study guide on Greek Classics supplements the original literary work, giving you background information about the author, an introduction to the work, a graphical character map, critical commentaries, expanded glossaries, and a comprehensive index, all for you to use as an educational tool that will allow you to better understand the work. This study guide was written with the assumption that you have read Greek Classics. Reading a literary work doesn't mean that you immediately grasp the major themes and devices used by the author; this study guide will help supplement your reading to be sure you get all you can from Greek Classics. CliffsNotes Review tests your comprehension of the original text and reinforces learning with questions and answers, practice projects, and more. For further information on Greek Classics, check out the CliffsNotes Resource Center at www.cliffsnotes.com.
First I wrote the following (with some embarrassment for my obvious inability to appreciate the ancient scribes): I made it through Homer, Hesiod, Aeschylus, Sophocles, and part way through Euripides, until I wearied of constant murder and mayhem, interspersed with fruit-basket turnover of wives and concubines. Then skipped over to Aristotle and back to Plato/Socrates, where the navel gazing was rather equally boring. Does the real poetry of the original works somehow compensate for the banality of this Cliffs summary?
Then I happened to read the following from pages 24 and 25 of the fiftieth anniversary edition of Bernard Bailyn’s The Ideological Origins of the America Revolution, concerning the sources of the ideas of eighteenth century Americans: . . . . [many writers] “thought Plato had been a liberty-loving revolutionary, while Jefferson, who actually read the Dialogues, discovered in them only the ‘sophisms, futilities, and incomprehensibilities’ of a ‘foggy mind’— an idea concurred in with relief by John Adams, who in 1774 had cited Plato as an advocate of equality and self-government but who was so shocked when he finally studied the philosopher that he concluded that the Republic must have been meant as a satire.”