Provocative anchor essays by Charles Van Engen, Paul Hiebert, and Ralph Winter (among the final publications of the latter two authors) on the definition of Christian mission, the nature of contextualization, and the future of Evangelical missions. Diverse response essays, ranging from deferential to reactionary and from deeply insightful to apparently missing the point. An engaging read that, as whole, reveals the underlying tension (or the major shift in question) in Evangelical missions: visionary missiologists present possibilities for greater faithfulness to God's mission, causing many to latch on to hobby horse definitions of biblical inerrancy that obscure the hermeneutical issues really at stake. Stetzer is evenhanded in his responses, and Hesselgrave's conclusion is consistent with his previous reactions to the issues raised.