No more alternating. It's Iris Johansen from here on out. I only have about 12 more books of hers to read.
"Quinn" takes place between "Eve" and "Bonnie." I've read both of those books, but I don't think I would enjoyed "Quinn" more if I hadn't read "Bonnie" first. Although this book doesn't make it obvious who Bonnie's killer is, it does make it obvious who it isn't, as soon as Catherine Ling gets sweet on him.
Next to Jane MacGuire, Catherine Ling is probably my least-favorite female regular in this series. I get sick of reading about how she grew up on the streets and married a 62-year-old when she was 17 (WTF), but "age is just a number" and they loved each other (but not passionately, just comfortably) and blah blah blah. Yes, we get it, she's special and deadly and smart and sexy...She's described as "exotic" because she's half-Chinese, half-"Caucasian." (Just say "white.") Look up "orientalism" if you don't understand why this is offensive. Naturally, it's Jane who describes her this way. How the hell would she know what Catherine's ethnicity was, anyway? Jane's probably just racist. It wouldn't surprise me.
Although the book's title is "Quinn," less than half of the book focuses on Joe. That didn't actually bother me so much as the lack of flashback time. I was interested in seeing more about what prompted Eve's decision to become a forensic sculptor. It's possible that this is described in "Bonnie" and I just forgot. If that's the case, you can ignore this complaint.
At the very beginning of Joe's flashback, we see one of his coworkers, a woman, complain that she wanted the prominent Bonnie Duncan case, which Joe has been assigned to. She talks about how hard it is to break through the glass ceiling. Joe asks if there's a glass ceiling in the FBI, and she says there is. She's portrayed as someone who isn't willing to work for what she wants, and she offers to sleep with him (the implication being so that he'll treat her favorably in the future). Apparently they have before, too.
Ah, yes, those silly feminists and their whining about fairness in the workplace! Obviously, they just want to get to the top without working as hard as their male counterparts. They think that all they have to do is lift their skirts and it's easy street from there on in. Men can't sleep their way through their career, so it's actually women who are advantaged!
Obviously, that last paragraph was sarcasm, but this is an extremely offensive idea that's perpetuated by the anti-feminist crowd. And Iris Johansen's women Don't Need Feminism because they're Strong Female Characters (never mind that all of them are stalked, harassed, threatened, and sometimes raped by their so-called love interests). Give me a break. At least she didn't appear for the rest of the book...which makes me wonder, what was the point? Well, except for Joe to reduce her to a series of body parts, because this was before he met eve, and he didn't think of women as people. In fact, Eve is the first woman he actually sees as a human being and not as a potential bed mate. I'm serious. I actually took note of all the pages where he was super creepy about Eve, but on the day I finished "Quinn," I had a splitting headache and couldn't write this review, and now the book is back at the library. C'est la vie.
Nevertheless, I enjoyed the flashback, which lasted several chapters. It was interesting reading about the kind of person Eve was right after Bonnie's disappearance, when she was both newly devastated and also desperately clinging to the hope that her daughter was still alive. I did find it very unrealistic that the FBI would agree to let Eve look over the files for a local serial killer's case, but I wasn't surprised, and I'm used to that in this series. The entire world is willing to bend over backward for Eve, and it's not just because Joe's always standing behind her like an elephant in must. Eve has a way of charming everyone with her skill as a forensic sculptor (the best in the world!), her backstory (she CARES enough about her child to continue to look for her, unlike all those other grieving parents), how "special" Bonnie was (missing white woman syndrome...for kids!), and, last but certainly not least, Eve's more-interesting-than-pretty features (which, if you've seen the cover of "Silencing Eve," is complete BS).
...And I totally made it sound like I DIDN'T actually enjoy this part of the book. But I did. Maybe it's because Eve and Joe haven't actually undergone any character development through most of the series. The only reason they've even been able to move forward in their relationship with one another is that Joe finally got to see Bonnie in "Quicksand," so now he can appreciate her in a way similar to Eve. In the flashbacks, however, we get to see Joe go from being a grumpy womanizer to a grumpy man in love. We get to see Eve go from a distraught, grieving mother to a slightly less distraught, grieving mother who has at least some direction in what she wants to do. We also get to see another one of her skills--criminal sketches. I did kind of roll my eyes at how she did even better than a professional, but it didn't bother me as much as it might have, since I can see how forensic sketching would be related to forensic sculpting.
Sadly, as I mentioned before, the flashback didn't last as long as I would have liked. Even if it didn't go into how Eve became a forensic sculptor, I would have rather read about other things that happened at the time than what I was actually forced to read. Heck, I was ready to give this book a 3-star review.
But the rest of the book was tedious to read. It involved Catherine Ling going on the hunt to track down John Gallo, who everyone thinks killed Bonnie. John himself is certain that he killed Bonnie, because he's had blackouts and delusions ever since he was tortured in North Korea.
The book also makes sure to inform us that he's "schizophrenic" when the question is raised of why he would kill his own daughter. Ugh. As if schizophrenia isn't badly stigmatized enough. Sure, some people with schizophrenia are violent. Some people who smoke cigarettes are violent, too. That doesn't mean that "Why would he kill his own daughter?" should be answered with, "Well, he has a history of cigarette smoking."
Johansen could have simply explained that his delusions could have lead him to think that Bonnie was dangerous without mentioning a specific mental illness. In fact, the person speaking could have just said that plenty of children are killed by their parents--that familial ties don't necessary protect someone from a violent crime--which is perfectly true and makes a lot more sense.
In any case, we know almost immediately that John couldn't have killed Bonnie, because Catherine wants to bang him. No, seriously. She claims it's because his story doesn't add up, but the complete lack of caution she exercises around him gives her real priorities away. Iris Jo believes in "chemistry" above all else, including common sense. The bad guys are utterly repulsive to the heroines, and the heroes--even if they engage in torture, stalking, and even pedophilia (see "Pandora's Daughter" and "The Perfect Witness")--are super sexy and the heroines want to jump their bones and, therefore, they're one of the good guys. That's the kind of thinking an immature teenager (not just a teenager, an *immature* one) has, not a woman in her 20s. (Of COURSE she's in her 20s. In Iris Jo's world, nobody except Eve Duncan can accomplish anything past the age of 29, unless they're male, of course.)
Catherine and John's constantly wanting to bone ripped any sort of tension out of the story. You just know Johansen is planning for them to get together in a later book, so there's no way John is Bonnie's killer. The belligerent sexual tension is exactly the same as it is in every stand-alone Johansen novel, only the stakes are supposed to be higher. They don't really come across that way, though, because, again, the two characters act like whiny adolescents toward each other. Except, at one point, John knocks Catherine to the ground and she's like "Are you going to rape me?" and he's all "I really want to, but nah, I'm not *that* evil." Clap. Clap. Clap. Gosh, I really admire your restraint there. He adds that of course, it wouldn't be rape, because he'd make sure she'd enjoy it.
THIS KIND OF MENTALITY HAS REAL-WORLD CONSEQUENCES. Rapists are acquitted or given a light sentence because survivors and victims are accused of "wanting it." What the *hell*, Johansen? If a survivor or victim gets aroused during their rape, it's *still rape*. I don't care if you were born in 1938; you should know this by now.
Anyway, I don't see how anyone could be thrilled by this book, since it's part of a trilogy and everyone knows that the mystery of Bonnie's death won't be solved until the third book. The book ends on a cliffhanger, which is unusual for Johansen, so there's that. I can see how it would have been thrilling, if frustrating when "Quinn" first came out.
I say, if you can, just check out the entire trilogy at once, so you don't have to wait to continue the story. "Quinn" can't really stand on its own as a novel; it's not interesting enough.