Professor Neill's excellent and authoriatative survey examines centuries of missionary activity, beginning with Christ and working through the Crusades and the colonization of Asia and Africa up to the present day.
A very complete, succint global history of Christian missions up to the 1980s. Feels dated today, because of facts it could hardly deal with, each for a different reason: * takes an œcumenical approach, for instance to Romanist and Greek/Russian iconodulic missions; * takes seriously liberation theory; * ignores Reformed missionary activity in the XVI century; * ignores the liberal destruction of mainstream European Christianity; * predates the conservative resurgence, the Calvinistic renaissance, the global South and the revelation of the then-hidden, astonishing advance of Protestantism in China.
We still lack a more decidedly Reformed, even Evangelical, and more recent approach to the subject.
A History of Christian Missions was written by Stephen Neill in 1964. It was revised by Owen Chadwick in 1986.
Roughly the first half of the book covers the expansion of the church from the New Testament era until 1800. The second half covers the expansion during the period from 1800 to 1914. The history following 1914 is less focused on missions and more focused on the development of churches in various countries.
The author begins with the caveat that the page limitation of the book requires omitting much that occurred and selecting specific people and places as the focus of the book.
The author(s) are very ecumenical in outlook and focus much attention on the Roman Catholic and Anglican contribution to missions. Protestants are given much less focus. The original author, Stephen Neill, served as a missionary in India and has much knowledge about the history of missions in that country. The book focuses most of its attention on Europe, Asia, and Africa. Little attention is given to North and South America.
By the second half of the book the reader may grow weary of the minutia. This reader did. Even still, there is much to glean about the history of missions and missions strategy in this book.
Perhaps the greatest lesson that is consistently presented in this book is that in the history of missions there has not been enough effort put into training nationals to lead in missions and church life.
Third read, but over 50 years, and it’s still a great survey of Christian missions. My favorite part is the chapter on the colonial era, but throughout the progress of Christianity is amazing, however at great cost and sacrifice. Of course, much has occurred in the 60 years since publication of this book.
I got about half way into this book and never finished. I liked the book mainly for giving me a general picture of what the Church has been doing missionally the past two thousand years. I must be honest though, I rarely knew what geographic location was being referred to half the time. However, I valued it for the very broad outline it provided in my mental knowledge of Church history.
This is one of those reviews that is nearly impossible to do. Prof. Neill does a brilliant job in tackling such a vast subject and to cover it all in 500 odd pages is quite a task and there will always be something vital left out. That's expected. However one gets the feeling that this book was never to be more than a simple survey which is regrettable. Also the book is presented from purely a western perspective and has somewhat one sided view of missions. As an Indian much of the ground realities of India was never discussed and it almost nearly presented the missionary enterprise in positive light despite centuries of abuse particularly among the Roman Catholic missions. I imagine others would feel the same. Thus due to this I give this an average 3.
A dry, but thorough, overview of Christian missions. Neill highlights the expansionist mindset of the Church and the challenges and successes of the church as it expanded to become a "Global Religion." Some language, by this point, is dated. The points he raises on the tension between the church and the mission, the local and the global, and missionary and the church remain relevant.
A very complete history of the missional endeavors of the church up through the middle of the 20th century. It was a bit of a slog to get through at points, but I learned a lot about the church in other parts of the world and came away with a lot of books to read about concerning the church outside of the western world.
I find it fascinating at the beginning, but it took me a long time to finish it. There's just so much to cover in one book it became laboured reading as he bounced around all the regions of world and tried to give snippets of all that was happening.
Though he occasionally falls into a triumphalistic tone, Neill presents a strong narrative for how Christianity has built itself into a truly universal religion
“What is clear is that every Christian was a witness. Where there were Christians, there there would be a living, burning faith, and before long an expanding Christian community.”
Still a valuable book on missions. My major complaint is that while it is supposed to be a history of Christian missions, the vast majority covered is Western and Protestant in scope. Because of this, only the first 50 pages covers the first 1500 years of missions history, with little coverage of missions by Eastern churches at any time. Despite this, what is emphasized is covered well.
From the apostles to the present day, the progress of the growth of the church has been nothing short of phenomenal. Stephen Neill, an Anglican with a wide and ecumenical view of the church, helpfully breaks down mission work into two broad categories -1.) early church to the French Revolution and 2.) The Enlightenment to present day.
Within these two broad historical movements, he begins by blocking out roughly 500 year periods and explains what makes this time unique and then gives a worldwide tour through this timeframe, giving snippets about each country or region. As the book nears the present day, the timeline splits into Protestant and Roman Catholic sections. Also, the time covered narrows and speeds up.
The final chapter is really the point of the book and the historical information is designed to make the arguments clearer. Neill points out several areas of concern that need constant attention as we go forward. I'll mention three. 1.) What elements of native culture can be retained and what must necessarily be destroyed? 2.) When is it appropriate and right to develop indigenous leadership within the church and the best method for doing so? 3.) What is the relationship between the mission (foreign missionaries bringing a new message) and the church (established gatherings of committed Christians who pursue faithful obedience and proclamation of the gospel).
I read the 1st edition (1966) and there is a revised edition from the mid '80's. The original was composed with the high hopes of ecumenical cooperation and formal unity, developed largely from a desire to undo the fracturing caused by the Reformation. There are hints in the book that this experiment won't end well, but Neill seems hopeful that it may be successful.
What he didn't know is that post-Modernism (or rather, consistent Liberalism) was on the way which would lead to the meaningless muddle and soupy puddle of the collapse of the mainline churches. The hints are there in the historical explanation and analysis but missed in his summary section.
I suspect that this book couldn't have been written by a baptist or Presbyterian or a Roman Catholic.
As my September class seeks only to cover Church history to circa 1000, this nook will be ever so briefly set aside at this juncture–the year 1500.
I have found Niall's prose to be something akin to a transcript of a lecture performed by a knowledgeable, well-spoken, and at times opinioned professor. Which, I suppose, it is! Anyone who is interested in the spread of Christianity will certainly find what he wants within this text's covers. I actually look forward to revisiting Niall's list of nations (helpfully italicized) to write them down with a summary account. It will, I think, offer interesting material for my history course.
One minor–very minor–critique. This is one of four books in the Penguin History of the Church that I own. ( I will read The Middle Ages and In the Age of Revolution in the near future. ) I thoroughly enjoyed The Early Church; it is exceptionally well written. The series is written by fine, scholarly Anglicans, but Chadwick took no potshots as Niall does on occasion. For example, he mentions a man who professed in the 4th century to be Catholic–But certainly not a ROMAN Catholic, Niall assures us. I understand Anglican claims to being a third branch of the historical and Universal Church, but I think Niall's bias showed itself here nonetheless.
At any rate, a fine and helpful book. I look forward to picking it back up.
How did Christianity spread before Constantine? Did we stagnate, grow, hibernate, slip, or survive during the dark times between 500 and 1000? What did the discovery of the New World do the organizations, relationships and unities of the churches? Etc. Good read and very useful. Helps place the stories of individuals in a larger picture.