Who owns your genetic information? Might it be the doctors who, in the course of removing your spleen, decode a few cells and turn them into a patented product? In 1990 the Supreme Court of California said yes, marking another milestone on the information superhighway. This extraordinary case is one of the many that James Boyle takes up in Shamans, Software, and Spleens, a timely look at the infinitely tricky problems posed by the information society. Discussing topics ranging from blackmail and insider trading to artificial intelligence (with good-humored stops in microeconomics, intellectual property, and cultural studies along the way), Boyle has produced a work that can fairly be called the first social theory of the information age. Now more than ever, information is power, and questions about who owns it, who controls it, and who gets to use it carry powerful implications. These are the questions Boyle explores in matters as diverse as autodialers and direct advertising, electronic bulletin boards and consumer databases, ethno-botany and indigenous pharmaceuticals, the right of publicity (why Johnny Carson owns the phrase Here's Johnny!), and the right to privacy (does J. D. Salinger own the letters he's sent?). Boyle finds that our ideas about intellectual property rights rest on the notion of the Romantic author--a notion that Boyle maintains is not only outmoded but actually counterproductive, restricting debate, slowing innovation, and widening the gap between rich and poor nations. What emerges from this lively discussion is a compelling argument for relaxing the initial protection of authors' works and expanding the concept of the fair use of information. For those with an interest in the legal, ethical, and economic ramifications of the dissemination of information--in short, for every member of the information society, willing or unwilling--this book makes a case that cannot be ignored.
Introduced to this author by a friend last night. Seems he's sort of like a Naomi Klein pop-writer of sorts that has grown out of traditions like Midnight Notes (just learned about this group last night too) and Autonomedia. Things like "The Commons" (yeah, think Boston Commons or Creative Commons and it's along those lines of self-organizing, self-sustaining). Anyhoo, looks like he might be worth a read.
Not as straight-forward as Boyle's more recent book, The Public Domain, this provides an interesting introduction (from a 1990s point of view) to what it mean to be part of an information society and what cultural ideologies surround the concept of information. (And how all that affects copyright policy.)