I have about ten books to review, some from months ago, that I should have reviewed right away. This is one of them.
This is unique because the author, Sofios, is a reporter/journalist who befriended the family/surviving victims of this crime. It feels honest - I think Sofios wrote this with honesty.
I'd have liked to have seen more photos. Normally the amount included would be the average amount but with a family of this size, and so many victims, the photos are small in number.
There are things I want to know that Sofios can't tell me. How did this go undetected for so long? Why do people put up with this in the beginning? I get the whole 'brainwashed' thing. I even believe it in some cases. I don't know if I entirely believe it here. The kids? Probably. The wife? No dice.
No one can make me believe that the girls in the family, who were not even allowed to talk to their brothers and spent tremendous amounts of "alone time" with their monster "father" got pregnant and the mother didn't think it suspicious. A normal family the suspicion would fall on a boyfriend, lover, one night stand, etc. This family? No. By all accounts these girls were allowed to do nothing but worship this piece of shit. How would they get pregnant any other way?
The "mother" says often - and Sofios seems to buy it - that she "didn't know". "I just didn't know that Alysia." How? Why didn't you know?
IMO, 'not knowing' and 'not wanting to know' are two different things. A part of me hates to say this - I could never even dream of the pain this woman has gone through. But at the same time, it's me being honest.
I do applaud Sofios for coming to their aid because if it's true, the state was only caring for those members of the family who agreed to side with the prosecution. As much as I wouldn't want to see any family members in this circumstance side with the defense, is that really a reason to leave them out in the cold? If you have the ability to care for the one side you have the ability to care for the others as well. To expand on that a little, I would think they'd have a better chance of making the family members "see the light" if they did open some sort of dialogue.
It bothered me on page 310 when the author mentions seeing on the news that Wesson's dirty ass dreads were hacked off. Hack the hair off. That's fine with me. They could hack his head off and I wouldn't care. It's what was done with it that bothered me.
According to the news report and Alysia the disgusting things were sent to Locks of Love. So, in the authors words, now they were allowing a 'bunch of little kids to run around with a mass murderer's hair on their heads.' And that's not even o mention how they cleaned it. I saw pictures and I'm here to say I doubt it could be done. That crap wouldn't touch my child.
There are other questions too - how did the officers outside the house not hear the shots? Is there a gun that quiet? Neighbors supposedly head shots, why didn't the people who were in the very yard of the house where these people were murdered?
I don't have much, if any, sympathy for Sebhrenah. I feel like I should but I don't. Other kids got out. Other kids saw that this wasn't right. How could she turn a gun on babies? On her own babies at that? All on the word of one single "human".
I don't have enough sympathy inside to have any left for her. I certainly have none for Wesson. I feel for the kids and babies who were brutally murdered and left in some sort of horrid pile. And I do feel for the remaining family members. Not for the two responsible for this atrociousness.
All in all it's written well. It doesn't have that journalist ring to it that makes books so hard to read for some people. The crime is unique enough to make it interesting for those looking for that also.