Environmental Case for Nuclear Power: Economic, Medical, and Political Considerations

by Robert C. Morris

In the 20th Century, air pollution produced by the fossil fuels killed over five million Americans. It contributes to two of our worst environmental problems—acid rain and global warming. By contrast, Western-built nuclear power has not been responsible for even one death in the public sector. It’s increased use would lessen our trade deficit, and decrease acid rain and global warming. So, why aren’t we building nuclear power plants? Since 1974, anti-nuclear power activists have prevented the construction of nuclear power plants through the dissemination of fear and superstition. When the records of the fossil fuels and nuclear power are set straight, nuclear power is clearly superior. This is the opinion of almost one million scientists and medical doctors who have gone on record as favoring the use of nuclear power.

Paperback

First published July 1, 2000

Reviews

[Mike · Rating 3 out of 5]

I agree with the author's premise that nuclear power is the best solution but the book needs to be updated. Specifically he needs to address the security updates post 9/11. He also needs to address the Fukashima accident snd the differences between the Japanese emergency planning and exercising versus what we do in the U.S. Additionally the natural gas from fracking is undercutting nuclear power which is counter to some of his arguments. That being said nuclear power is still the best long term energy solution we have.

[Dick · Rating 3 out of 5]

Three Stars so far.... Of course I happen to pretty much agree with the author's views of the anti-nuke folks and the burn more oil and coal proponents.

[Karl Schempp · Rating 4 out of 5]

If you are not sure about nuclear power, read this and learn how we need to get off of coal. Cough, Cough.

[Jani-Petri · Rating 1 out of 5]

Right on the issues, but a bit boring to read.