I cannot say why but I LOVE the 18th century, which is the reason I picked up this book in the first place. I’m glad I did. It took me on an interesting romp and made me consider things much closer to home than Edward Hyde. Certainly Bonami reminds us how necessary it is to dispassionately and critically consider how the press and public opinion are shaped and misshapen. If this book were magically plopped down in the early 18th century, the Grub Street Press would probably rip the author apart. The content, however, is less threatening today because time insulates us from the emotion surrounding the issues. But what a great lesson the author provides in cultivating temperance of thought when dealing with the media.
We humans are marvelously but frustratingly complex and because of this, so are our thought processes, communication, mythology, politics, technology, and art. Put three people in a room, add a cup of controversy, a pinch of contention and mix thoroughly. In a surprisingly small snippet of time these people will say things; do things; create things; react to things; destroy things; feel things; and think things. In about 60 minutes you will find a bounty of material to deconstruct and analyze until (as Grandma used to say) the cows come home. So what happened in those 60 minutes when those three peeps were doing their thang? A lot happened. If you were charged with learning of their engagement (or non-engagement) with their environment and with each other during the allotted time, you could write quite a bit. Maybe you could talk with some of them, but perhaps some have already left the room and you are forced to discover what happened through less direct means. Imagine doing the same thing by looking through a small scope, at a distance of hundreds and sometime thousands of years? But that’s what historians do for the rest of us. A critical job of the historian is to actually decipher “what happened” instead of “what we would like to have happened”. Being knowledgeable, intelligent, and articulate are certainly requirements for the job. But the best historians, the ones who bring us JOY by challenging us as well as informing us, have a canny, tacit grasp of human nature that makes them insightful and broad-minded. IMHO the finest among them check their egos at the door and focus dispassionately on their work. I know little of Bonami, but I think she does a solid job of looking at the extant evidence in a dispassionate manner.
I would recommend this book to anyone who likes to read about things like character assassination and sleazy politics. Both distress me A LOT, but I stayed engaged because of Bonami’s careful consideration of the material, and my fascination with this period in history.