I realised that one of the famous bits of history in the East End that I didn't know nearly enough about was the "matchgirls strike" of 1888. Despite being mentioned in Fishman's 1888 book it really didn't go into very much detail. I found a copy of this book in our library and then borrowed a copy from Whitechapel. I have to say it was very good! It was a lovely feminist history questioning the presumed assumptions that it was in fact a middle class woman coming in and organising a strike among the girls that was responsible not only for it happening in the first place but for its success. Raw also questioned the fact that labour historians are always seperating the women's strike from the docker's strike a year later. She was able to show how closely related the women and the dockers were (living together in the same streets and families) and quotes from the dockers themselves about how the women had been an inspiration. She also looked at the chronology of the strike, the companies records as to who they thought the leaders were and talked to the descents of the women who had been responsible for the strike. It was a solid attempt to acknowledge the agency of the working class women themselves and how that has been distorted by time. One of the things that was most interesting to see was the details of the women's lives after the strike and what their different lives were like afterwards, the different businesses they went to and the feelings of pride they had in what they'd been able to do. Reading this book made me realise that labour history isn't really an area I'm terribly interested in but this book was still very interesting in the way it challeneged assumptions. Raw was very clear in her evidence and her historical methods, and the strengths and weaknesses of what she was using. The only point I had an issue with was the way she ignored Bessant's later role with the women. Even if she hadn't started the strike with them she was involved with them later and this wasn't really addressed, indeed it seemed at times her role was downplayed as one instance she was referred to as "the secretary" rather than by her actual name when talking about the later impact of the strike. Still it was a very interesting book and one I'd definitely recommend to people interested in this period, the histor of labour and the lives of working class women.