Let me say, first of all, that I'm a huge fan of Curott as a person. I don't know her, of course, but I follow her social media and think she's lovely in general. She's very smart, savvy, and a trailblazer in the Wiccan community.
This is a critique of this particular book, not the woman behind it.
I thought I would give this book another chance, as I read it many years ago and didn't care for it.
Well..upon re read, I actually enjoyed it less.
The basic tale, in a nutshell, is how Curott awakens her sexuality and need for physical/partner love via a powerful love spell where she invokes her "daemon"; a spirit that can seemingly shape shift into different archetypes, representing the man she is looking for (in this case, James Dean is the main example, with some mention of Bruce Springsteen.). Curott ends up meeting Derek at the bookstore/temple she has attended since the last book, and it's powerful love/lust at first sight. They do live together, get married, etc..but like you might have guessed, the spell runs dry and Curott is left in an unfulfilling relationship, looking to start over again.
While I think it's wonderful to have a tastefully written book about women's sexuality, and am not a prude, this book started to dive into Harlequin Romance-style territory as I was reading it. The descriptions of her sexual fantasies and her experiences of sex actually got to the point where I was rolling my eyes. If it was erotica, it wasn't well written, which was a surprise, as Curott is a good writer, judging from her other books. Derek is (literally) the dream lover she summons to life, the "working class poet with a heart of gold" she's been looking for since the first book. He's long haired, incredibly handsome, working as a surveyor and listlessly trying to get a music career off the ground (not trying very hard..). Derek identifies as a gnostic Christian, has friends that are Wiccan, and has no issue with her spirituality.
The sex scenes and fantasies came off as overdone and over detailed to me, and as I said before, was more of a tawdry romance-style, smut book than a "memoir of erotic awakening'" as it's described. Don't get me wrong..there's a time and a place for smut, but this book is supposed to be about sex/love magic, the spiritual side of sex, and it was basically stereotypical heterosexual female fantasies for pages. They didn't come off as believable, and the book seemed to be short on a solid plot
This was another issue ..I found that time and place jumped around so much, I couldn't keep track. Near the beginning, when Curott is confiding in Nonna about how she is lonely and wants to cast a spell to attract her dream man, she mentions being almost 28. That would put the year about 1982. Towards the end, she mentions a Calvin Klein perfume ad of a naked man and woman on a swing. Because I'm a nerd, I looked that up..that ad came out in 1991. So..the book spanned roughly 9+ years? How long were she and Derek together, then how long married? The movie screenwriter (whom I'm almost positive is Henry Jaglom) that Curott is friends with, mentions his movie "Always"..which came out in 1985, if it's the same movie I'm thinking of. The movie he and Curott work on together, "New Year's Day", is 1989. Curott is well into her marriage with Derek at this time. The timeline has me confused, as I don't think it took 5 years for her to meet Derek after her spell...or did it? I know autobiographies can blur a timeline somewhat and almost no one has a black/white memory, but I found this totally confusing. She also mentions near the end that she is a High Priestess after "years of training". She joined her coven around 1979-80. Is it the 90s now? The book jumped forward ten years? I don't know, but at least to me, it wasn't clear and added to the whole heavy on fantasy and little on solid autobiography that was this book.
Derek, poor sod, tends out to be weak and ineffectual, not looking for work, not pulling his weight in the marriage. I had some more eye rolling when Curott and Nonna are talking about the whole female/male dynamic, how it's ok to "be female/needy/wanting to be looked after" after she'd spent so long being "male/independent/strong". They do talk about how there is male/female in each of us, but ascribing those qualities to specific genders I find to be stereotypical and an echo of the past. For witches that are all about female empowerment and defying stereotypes, they're falling into a pretty out of date gender binary.
I admit, I'm dying to know who Derek is. I sincerely hope he's a composite or something, because reading this book would be a gigantic OUCH, even though years have passed (I think?). What did his friends and family think? Did she get permission (not that she had to..).?? I know Curott has been married a few times, but I'll be damned if I can place this guy. Maybe that was the whole idea.
For a modern, strong, confident woman trying to defy stereotypes, Curott's obsession with finding her dream man (and the same goes for the women in her coven) struck me as out of character. She seemed to be thinking that a man would solve all her loneliness and need., yet at another point said she'd never wanted to get married. She comes off as needy and easily deceived when it comes to men. Maybe she was. Goodness knows, I've been there. But it seemed so incongruent and stereotypical for a book about female empowerment.
The book is also heavily about her relationship with the coven Elder, Nonna, who comes across as a Dr. Ruth/village wise woman/grandma character. Again, maybe she was, but she seemed almost too perfect to be human. Maybe she was an composite of several people, or an ideal that Curott invented to move the story along and include the scads of information that Nonna shares about daemons, sex magic, and relationships. I was disappointed that we didn't read more about Jeannette from the first book, Maia or Bellona. It's said they are getting handfasted (Maia and Bellona), and that's it. It would have been cool to include some more info or even a mention of the ceremony, but that doesn't happen. Curott is close with Gillian (again, dying to know who she is..she's supposed to have a very "prominent" surname of a wealthy NYC family..Rockefeller? Astor? Hilton? Hearst? Another composite?) and becomes closer to Mindy and Naomi from the first book, with some mention of Annabelle. The scenes with Curott and the gals from circle seem to be echoing "Sex and the City", which, while I loved, was problematic and seemed stale to be mentioned in the book, it read as stereotypes of how people imagine that women behave and talk.
Speaking of "Sex and the City", the label dropping gets tiresome: Hermes, Armani, Manolo ,Versace,.Lo (who I haven't heard of, but i'm not big on designers), etc. Curott talks about being on a tight budget, then she's going off to Italy and buying Armani scarves. Nonna dresses in vintage designer wear. Gillian wears designer clothes (of course). Poor old Mindy is stuck in the "same wool coat she wore for the past 3 years" as she talks about how kids are expensive. I guess I'm poor compared to these women, as I thought a wool coat was supposed to last 3 years or beyond. It also read as a little catty that she noticed that. Are most people in this book wealthy? NYC is insanely expensive. I don't know what Nonna did for a living or her background, but the majority of the women having labels to burn on "tight budgets" gave me yet another eye roll moment. I get that Curott was stretched to make all the bills on their condo (which was likely hugely costly) etc when Derek was a deadbeat and wasn't working, but the mere fact she could do that and still manage to do all this extra stuff was insane. I honestly don't think she has a realistic concept of money. It's hinted at that her background was wealthy, at least, her Mother's family was. It reminded me of "eat, pray, love" in a way. Curott acknowledges she's privileged, but then doesn't do much to unpack that., and the constant hobnobbing with famous people and designer labels get tiresome.
Her foray into film making was confusing. I get it, film was magical for her and she enjoyed it. But..a lawyer going back to get a film degree? That would be an insane schedule. She mentions being worried she can't afford it with Derek not working, now she's paying for film school without a problem. She also mentions getting a "six figure cheque" after talking about being stretched to then max working in a small law office. Again, sure, NYC is expensive, but...
I'm also confused as to why "Dale" (Jaglom) wanted her to associate produce a movie. She had zero experience. She was a lawyer by profession. He said because she was "smart". Mmmkay....other than the "New Year's Day" movie mentioned, a screenplay she says gets shown at (name drop here) prominent film festivals, then one called "Venice/Venice " where she makes a cameo, the film thing seems to peter out and seems to be no more than a plot device.
I have seen pictures and am aware that Curott is a very attractive woman, but the way men keep seeming to fall at her feet, gape at her, and give compliments constantly due to her "magic"was getting to me. It sounded pretty unrealistic. We've all had things like that happen, of course, but not constantly. She is attractive, yes, but like most of us, isn't a supermodel that would have heads spinning as soon as she walked in. I also didn't like how she seemed to constantly seek validation from the male gaze under the guise of discovering her "feminine" power. It seemed to be sexism below a thin veneer of spiritual teaching about yin/yang by Nonna.
That leads me to my biggest, and darkest, issue with the book. The scene where Derek practically assaults her in an alley after an argument when they're in Chinatown.She and Nonna explain it later as being "ravished" consensually, but that's sure not what it sounded like..she was angry and asking to be let go, and he was grappling her. She talks later about being ashamed of perhaps having rape fantasies after the weird bullwhip-cave dream, but doesn't connect that with what happened with Derek. There's another time when she's asking him to slow down with foreplay and he asks if "it's in" and says it should be, and she says "it was not a request" and runs and gets her diaphragm. 'It was not a request"?? So he was telling her what to do? I could understand if it was a roleplay kink, but that didn't seem to be what was happening at all. It sounded like he was calling the shots and telling her they had to quit the foreplay. ugh.
It was also kind of amusing that Curott expected their hot sex and lust to be the same after they'd been together for a while. I get it was disturbing when she wasn't even attracted to him, but being disappointed that the sex isn't as constant as it is in a new relationship seemed to be pretty naive for a 28-30 year old (??) woman who'd had other relationships. It was also tied in a neat package that her marriage seems to (There's that time line again) coincide with when she's done her saturn return-foreshadowed by Nonna earlier.
The beginning sequence of her "dream lover" that is repeated (or continued?) at the end is also incredibly cheap romance novel type stuff..then we're led to believe that it just might come true. Maybe it did for her, but in real life, Witchcraft typically isn't as instant and direct as she has described in this book and Book of Shadows- it was a very Hollywood portrayal. This may have been her experience, and those of the women in the coven that she mentions, but somehow I doubt it.
All that said, the bo0k wasn't altogether horrible. I did learn a lot about daemons, kundalini rising, and James Dean (although the James Dean scenes, especially the one at the grave, were really weird, bordering on creepy. I get that famous people can channel archetypes and be a spiritual guide, perhaps, but this went into bizarre territory). The description of the rituals were beautiful. I liked learning more about Curott's family background (although the "Daddy issues" thing was pretty textbook-stereotypical, and confusing, as Curott talked of her father in glowing terms before.), and catching up with the coven.
I think the idea for the book was great, the execution..not so great.
Try for yourself, though!