I can't imagine a much better reading experience on the subject of American politics.
I wanted to learn more about the original Mayor Daley. The extent of my knowledge about the old man came from the shaded nostalgia of my lifelong-Chicagoan parents and the title of the book American Pharaoh, mixed with my own assumptions of the mythic power of the man who preceded and paved the way for my own Mayor Daley's iron-fisted reign. As an ancillary, I looked forward to finally reading something by Mike Royko. I don't remember much about that old man except that he died when I was fairly young and was beloved by most of the older Chicagoans I knew.
What a revelation this book, then, a slim volume that goes down like popcorn. It is not a scholarly or comprehensive work, or even proper journalism. The criteria of any of those domains would have caused Royko's cynical raillery to sag. And anyway, that's not what we're here for. Boss is a devilishly keen rendering of the story of Daley's Chicago, delivered in a voice that is pitch-perfect: nostalgia stripped of wistfulness, unrelenting muckraking devoid of unctuosity, and most of all, a bird's eye view of the Chicago culture that lives in Royko's marrow. It is a superbly knowing voice and it therefore rings true, so much so that citations would be mere clutter. There are plenty of interviews, quotations, facts, and figures, but there's no bibliography and no question about the veracity of the tale Royko tells.
And anyway, one could spend an entire volume just proving the truth one way or the other about any of Daley's claims. Indeed, a key tactic of his reign seemed to be to force his opponents in the courts and the press to abide by a standard of proof and logic that he never considered; keep them back with enough shotgun blasts of bullshit and they're bound to slow down. In that way, this "non-scholarly" work is actually the exact journalistic counterpart to the Machine's lies and corruptions. An academic tone would have lost the crucial flavor of life under King Richard, and a courtroom-caliber indictment would have proved nothing we didn't already know.
He never criticizes Daley outright, but each page drips with resigned disgust. The story here is not of the vaunted "pharaoh" of lore but of a consummately ordinary, boring man who was merely the wiliest spur to emerge from Chicago's longstanding Democratic Machine. He was the third Bridgeport mayor in a row, Royko points out, and when he finally arrived at a level of real power as Chairman of the Cook County Democratic Central Committee - after two decades of working his way up the ranks; this was no Alexander the Great or Barack Obama - his accomplishment was that "he finally had his own machine." What I associate with Daley-style management is actually simply Machine politics; Daley was merely able to wield the Machine better than anyone else to that point.
Which is to say nothing of how good a mayor he was, only that the Machine's goal was power and patronage and it sustained both of those things. As an autocrat, Daley kept his troops serried and fed. As the executive of a prosperous American city, he was awful. Because he was an apparatchik instead of a visionary, he lacked the creativity or magnanimity it would have required to see beyond his own heuristics and identify, say, the need for a legitimate public health administrator, not his family doctor. (An outbreak of TB almost happened.) An actual police commissioner. (He reluctantly got a certified expert to run the CPD for a little while, and while the man was very successful in running his department, he didn't take orders from Daley and so was promptly replaced by a yes man, who brought the police back into thuggish and haphazard form.) Daley's policies somehow managed to neglect, utterly, the needs of both his white and black constituents, the former who moved to the suburbs and the latter who were segregated, South-like, into ghettos, without hope or adequate plumbing. Actually, not somehow: deliberately, the Machine only cared about furthering its existence by being a parasite on the blood that was the average Chicagoan. If the citizens shrugged and accepted it because they knew no other way, and if the system of corruption worked predictably enough that one could either leverage it if he was cunning or be squashed by it if he was out of line, that said nothing of the system's failure to cater to the city.
It's mostly frustrating to read of Daley's obduracy and monolithic view of the world. Everything was framed in terms of his power. If advocacy groups came in to ask for something, his inclination to give it to them depended entirely on how much fealty he perceived was being shown to him. If he was a legitimate leader, someone who rose to power without a vast and unstoppable Machine, he would have necessarily picked up some Napoleonic cunning along the way. He would have seen that his power was only heightened by the happiness and welfare of his people. As it was, he was none of those things and had none of those percipiences.
I will say that Royko, in his unerring disregard for Daley, his administrative style, and what he did to Chicago, never seems to acknowledge what exactly kept Chicago from going the way of other industrial Midwestern cities like Cleveland or Detroit. Something must have happened at some point, because Chicago has made the transition to modern American destination city very well. Others have not. Maybe that was Daley the younger. And speaking of which, it's funny throughout this book to think of Royko's reaction must have been when it became clear that Richard M. was going to be the next mayor for life. I'm going to try to dig up what he thought of that. I have an idea.
In total, this was among the most enjoyable and informative and real books I have ever read. It's sort of a working man's Sandburg-on-Lincoln, wherein a titanic IL writer takes on a mythic IL politician. The other comparison that kept striking me, stretch that it is, was of Homer writing about the gods. The Royko of Boss is no historian; he is a witness, interpreter, cohort, and conscience. It's an understatement to say, as other reviews have, that his "intimate knowledge of Chicago" is on display here. This was Chicago who wrote the book, as channeled through Mike Royko. Thank gods for that.