Autumn’s Comments (group member since Nov 21, 2025)

Autumn’s comments from the The Debate Club group.

temporary as in your not going to be stuck there for eternity, because you’ll be reincarnated at some point😭😭think I probably could have worded that bette my bad

I don’t consider it a choice. It’s not something one wakes up one day and decides, but rather something that they already feel but just do not realize until a certain point. Many people don’t even know their identity exists for some time, despite having feelings of it.

@Tessie

I wanted to add on to that.
I am Hindu and honestly love yapping about our beliefs because I feel that even if the may not appeal to someone else they can still be interesting because they are so different from other religions.
Hindu views of the afterlife, at least from what I have been taught, aren’t solely that good karma can give you salvation (release from cycle of reincarnation & becoming a part of God) but more about the idea of sacrifice. By which I mean, forsaking worldly things and attachments or engaging in methods or prayers that do not allow you to gain karma. (such as karma yoga, where one does selfless acts for God/in his name, which stops their good karma from attaching to them and forcing them to be reincranated)
We do have a heaven (and a hell, as you mentioned) but both are temporary and one does get reincarnated eventually, per hinduism, rather than facing punishment/bliss forever.

Syd wrote: "Autumn wrote: "Not really. I know school libraries can't keep books with smut, but public libraries can, because they have adult sections. And minors can read and check books out from adult section..."

yeah my school still has some but it's technically not supposed to, and I think there's also been a crackdown on it where I live this year.

Not really. I know school libraries can't keep books with smut, but public libraries can, because they have adult sections. And minors can read and check books out from adult sections. So it's restricted to some extent, but not completely.

@Barnette
yeah, i usually just shove it up my sleeve, then into my pocket and that works most of the time to smuggle it in🥲

@minnie
yessss i agree. like it shouldn't be something people tease about or are made to be uncomfortable mentioning. it's a biological fact of life.

sorry gonna be really off topic but

YOU GUYS HAVE DISPENSERS???
i literally have to smuggle pads in like i have something to hide😭😭

I’m going to jump into this conversation real quick.

Being a furry is a way of expressing oneself, the same way one’s aesthetic/fashion choices are used to express oneself. Wearing a tail/ears/etc seems similar to wearing bows/headbands/scarves and other accessories. The only difference is that the accessory choices of furries are considered more unconventional, but I don’t see why that should be a barrier.

I think both of you (unless I got mixed up backreading) agreed that full fur suits and full face masks may need to be restricted and that would be logical due to the current school dress code (in my school we can’t have masks for halloween so i would assume they wouldn’t like masks in everyday wear. Full fur suits would just be unwieldy and disrupt learning, as Barnette mentioned. However, I can’t see how other accessories are remotely distracting or harmful. On Halloween, many people dress up in much more outrageous/distracting costumes and this has never been a problem. Teachers are unbothered by it, and students learn just fine. I knew a girl who dressed up in creative outfits 2-3 times a week and everyone was used to it. Peoples fashion choices have never been a source of distraction, but rather admiration or compliments.

Tails, ears, wings, etc accessories are small and merely a way of expressing one’s identity or fashion choices. The same way one may wear colored contacts or face paint to school, furry accessories may stand out but shouldn’t necessarily be distracting.

Just my thoughts & examples on the matter. Sorry if these concepts were already discussed or disproven, I tried to backread but I may have missed something.

There’s also the equal pay gap which is pretty much present to some extent worldwide.

this is making me laugh at the pure absurdity the more i back read the more it becomes clear just how much info he skipped to state a pure prejudice😭😭bro we fr?

✧˖°. chloe ✧˖°. wrote: "if LGBTQ+ is a "disease" then so is being straight and I say this as a straight person.."

fr like one’s identity cannot be a disease?? and if it is then we’re all infected bc we all identify as something??

Kacper wrote: "Homosexuality & lesbian are the biggest diseases of the 21st century"

buddy i can assure you that is not a proven fact. did you read anything i said about proof or did you just ignore it because you wanted to believe you were right above all others?

btw that this is hate speech, disrespectful, and as i said before, completely inappropriate. you’re a grown man, have some respect, nobody should have to point that out to you. whether you agree with homosexuality or not, you don’t have to phrase it in such a rude way, there are plenty of people on this site who feel the same way and still put their point across in a mature way.

But your evidence is your personal opinion? If you can’t use factual/proven evidence I don’t see how that statement is relevant.

But those are your personal thoughts, no? You can’t tell everyone else to believe that. And as I said before, that has absolutely nothing to do with this conversation.

To clarify: are you saying people from the left are enemies? Because I think that would be off topic.

the way i automatically read that in a country accent

Tessie wrote: I may have phrased that wrong, i mean like Christians believe if you aren't christian you're going to hell, from what i understand hindus don't necessarily condemn every other religion because like you said there are many ways to Brahman and moksha"

This is pretty off topic, but I wanted to elaborate on what you said: to my knowledge, Hinduism doesn't just believe in multiple gods, but that all our gods are manifestations of one being. It's a way of helping us understand who he is, so we as humans can understand him, as well as to test us to see his true self, by giving God a tangible form that can be visualized. Whereas his true form is intangible, and has no physical form or qualities (nirgun, nirakar). So I think the reason Hindus don't believe other religions are inherently wrong is because it's believed that all other religions are eventually leading you to the same spiritual end, and many believe that other religion's Gods are forms of that being (usually referred to as Brahman).

I am Hindu and I personally like to believe all religions are interconnected and that maybe the gods we believe in are the same.

helloooo I'm autumn i keep seeing updates and stuff from this group on the homepage and it looks interesting, so i joined!