PB
asked
Scott Hawkins:
It's a trivial detail but... I'm going to ask it anyway to satisfy my curiosity. If Carolyn's catalog is to know every other language there is, including the language of animals, why does she still have a difficult time communicating with Michael? Sticking only to her own catalog, can Carolyn learn the language of animals up to a certain depth? Or did I just misunderstand that part of the novel?
Scott Hawkins
This answer contains spoilers…
(view spoiler)[Hey Peachy,
Goodreads is being weird with this question. I'm not sure what's going on, but I've already answered it at least 2x, and for some reason it keeps disappearing. If you see this, please believe I'm not ignoring you.
It's a fair question. I did wrestle with this one a lot. There's a quote by Wittgenstein along the lines of "If a lion could talk, we would not understand him," that is sort of the gist of my answer.
I'm not completely sure that anyone, including Wittgenstein himself, knew what he meant by that quote, but I think the gist of it is that a lion's thought processes would be so different from ours (or any other herd animal's) that meaningful communication couldn't happen.
Michael was envisioned as the bridge to that gap. By immersing himself with the lives of animals, he gathered the life experiences necessary for their concepts to make sense. In practice, I envisioned it as a sort of dream state. You know how when you're on the verge of sleep and you get jolted awake--you can still sort of remember what you were thinking, but it slips away quickly and it doesn't really make any sense. That's the state of mind Michael lives in.
Carolyn gets the basics, but she's not a specialist. (hide spoiler)]
Goodreads is being weird with this question. I'm not sure what's going on, but I've already answered it at least 2x, and for some reason it keeps disappearing. If you see this, please believe I'm not ignoring you.
It's a fair question. I did wrestle with this one a lot. There's a quote by Wittgenstein along the lines of "If a lion could talk, we would not understand him," that is sort of the gist of my answer.
I'm not completely sure that anyone, including Wittgenstein himself, knew what he meant by that quote, but I think the gist of it is that a lion's thought processes would be so different from ours (or any other herd animal's) that meaningful communication couldn't happen.
Michael was envisioned as the bridge to that gap. By immersing himself with the lives of animals, he gathered the life experiences necessary for their concepts to make sense. In practice, I envisioned it as a sort of dream state. You know how when you're on the verge of sleep and you get jolted awake--you can still sort of remember what you were thinking, but it slips away quickly and it doesn't really make any sense. That's the state of mind Michael lives in.
Carolyn gets the basics, but she's not a specialist. (hide spoiler)]
More Answered Questions
Beachesnbooks
asked
Scott Hawkins:
I absolutely loved your book--it was so unique and creative. It's really refreshing to read something that different. I had a question about how you determined the disciplines that each of the children studied at the Library. Why was there no discipline for literature, or for history? What made you choose the areas of study that you did--was there anything in particular that influenced your choices?
TheReadingCat
asked
Scott Hawkins:
So let's get the fangirling out of the way first: I have never read something quite like this before, I am amazed at the sheer creativity. It was a joy, I really really loved it!! Now, my question is, if by some twist of fate Father would have taken you under his (probably raven-black) wing and, recognizing your literary genius, offered you the choice to actually pick your catalogue, which one would you want to learn?
Kelly
asked
Scott Hawkins:
I've read it three times now. I had my husband (loved it) and my book club read it. Book club is meeting tonight! I am curious if Father was the only god? I know that there are his friends, enemies, and creatures but are any of them also deity? And, with that in mind, why is there no catalog of all religions/faiths? I understand you had other catalogs & tossed some so curious if this was one. Thank you!
About Goodreads Q&A
Ask and answer questions about books!
You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.
See Featured Authors Answering Questions
Learn more




