MZD's The Familiar discussion

House of Leaves
This topic is about House of Leaves
14 views
House of Leaves > February 26 - March 3, Front matter and back cover. Dedication. Flap Copy

Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Ian (new) - rated it 4 stars

Ian Scuffling (ianscuffling) | 96 comments As this is the largest Mark Z. Danielewski enclave here on Goodreads, I figured I'd open this up here if anyone wants to discuss House of Leaves. I'll copy the formatting from The Familiar bookclub to have a thread for each "week" of reading.

Here's how you can join the FB group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/house...

Here's the full schedule from MZD in the FB group:

1) Feb. 26 - March 3
Front matter and back cover. Dedication. Flap copy.

2) March 4 - 10
This is not for You: Johnny Truant Introduction (pp. xi-xxiii)

3) March 11 - 17
Muss Es Sein: Navidson Record Chapters I - IV (pp. 3-40)

4) March 18 - 24
Echos: Navidson Record Chapters V - VII (pp. 41-96)

5) March 25 - 31
SOS in the Labyrinth: Navidson Record Chapters VIII - IX (pp. 97-152)

March 31: Q&A

6) April 1 - 7
Rescues: Navidson Record Chapters X - XI (pp. 153-274)

7) April 8 - 14
The Minotaur: Navidson Record Chapters XII - XIII (pp. 275-346)

8) April 15 - 21
House of Leaves and Haunted

9) April 22 - 28
Karen: Navidson Record Chapters XIV - XVII (pp. 347-407)

April 28: Q&A

10) April 29 - May 5
House of Leaves: Navidson Record Chapter XVIII - XX (pp. 408-490)

11) May 6 - 12
A Strange Light: Navidson Record Chapters XXI - XXIII (pp. 491-528)

12) May 13 - 19
Exhibits One and Appendix I (pp. 529-566)

13) May 20 - 26
Appendix II (pp. 567-656)

May 26: Q&A

14) May 27 - June 2
Academic criticism

15) June 3 - 10
Appendix III (pp. 657-709)

16) June 11 - 16
Other books and related work

17) June 17 - 22
Lemonade


message 2: by Ian (new) - rated it 4 stars

Ian Scuffling (ianscuffling) | 96 comments To note; the final week of the schedule mentions "Lemonade," which is being speculated as the name of the TV pilot for House of Leaves MZD wrote in late 2017—yes, there was talk to turn it into something for screen. Here's the rundown of the story as MZD tells it:

He recently posted that he had, until recently, been in discussion with a streaming service about turning House of Leaves into a multi-season TV series that he had show-runner control over. Unfortunately, it fell apart when the streaming company made clear they wanted to own ongoing IP rights to sequels, spin-offs, characters, etc. So, due to avarice, we will probably not see this come to life. A mixed blessing, perhaps.

Anyway, MZD stated today that in the last week of the book club, he will be sharing the script of the pilot episode he drafted. One assumes the episode's title is "Lemonade," a reference to the first scene with Navidson, drinking lemonade on his porch.


message 3: by Ian (new) - rated it 4 stars

Ian Scuffling (ianscuffling) | 96 comments The questions of authorship (and editorial stewardship) have always been interesting to me in this book (and it's a pretty common topic among readers of the book); who is Johnny writing to? Who are the editors and why do they fail so badly in streamlining and confining Johnny's storytelling and style (grammar, spelling, etc.)? Did Zampano exist? etc.

But I hadn't really considered the question in relation to something like the flap copy, which, instead of being a typical book blurb creates a fiction about the pre-publication creation of the book as a pile of pages passed around, showing up intermittently on the Internet. It turns it into an ephemera. A found object, in a sense. Essentially, MZD preempts the book's cult status by baking the mythos of cult object into it's most introductory materials: the jacket copy. Every detail in the book comes back to that central question of authorship, which is, itself an existential search. How did this text come to be? And by what was it formed? If we believe its cult history as Internet ephemera (and, to be clear, I'm not sure how true or false this myth is), can we know for certain who its creator would be? If we understand that cult history to be a falsehood, then to what end does it force us to question the believable and destructive falsehoods we encounter every day? In what ways are we duped by the monstrous unknowns of pretense and how can it be combated?


back to top