Little Bee
discussion
Little Bat Man
date
newest »
newest »
This character (Bat Man/Charlie) was the perfect foil for everything else the book was about. He was an innocent. He showed the forced maturity that life had thrust upon Sarah and Andrew, who up until then had lived in only a partially responsible fashion. He was also the unreadable (e.g. the mask) elements going on in the story line, the neutral elements in a plastic unfolding story which could be molded in any direction based upon the characters' actions, thoughts, intents against an unpredictable foe. He IS morality. In the end, Sarah's decision to bring him with her to Nigeria spoke to her utter foolhardiness in the midst of her righteous campaign. He should not have been sacrificed all along in several compromising emotional situations against which a more responsible parent would have shielded him.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic

Did anyone else think the book would have been better without him?