Deborah Anna Luepnitz

Deborah Anna Luepnitz’s Followers (25)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

Deborah Anna Luepnitz



Average rating: 4.28 · 2,004 ratings · 157 reviews · 5 distinct worksSimilar authors
Schopenhauer's Porcupines: ...

4.28 avg rating — 1,956 ratings — published 2002 — 11 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Family Interpreted: Psy...

by
4.11 avg rating — 45 ratings — published 1988 — 9 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Child custody: A study of f...

liked it 3.00 avg rating — 3 ratings — published 1982 — 2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
hedgehogs love - the story ...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
Sigmund Freud und Otto Rank...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by Deborah Anna Luepnitz…
Quotes by Deborah Anna Luepnitz  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“This etymology puts me in mind of Winnicott’s notion of potential space–that intermediate area between the subjective and objective in which creativity and play occur. Psychotherapy is akin to play, according to Winnicott. Therapy takes place neither inside the mind of the patient nor inside that of the therapist, but in some middle area, in the potential space between them.”
Deborah Anna Luepnitz, Schopenhauer's Porcupines: Intimacy And Its Dilemmas: Five Stories Of Psychotherapy

“Freud wrote: “The evidence of psychoanalysis shows that almost every intimate emotional relation between two people which lasts for some time–marriage, friendship, the relations between parents and children–contains a sediment of feelings of aversion and hostility, which only escapes perception as a result of repression.” Freud believed that the one exception to this was the love of a mother for her son, which was “based on narcissism,” proving only that he was, among many other things, an Old World Patriarch.”
Deborah Anna Luepnitz, Schopenhauer's Porcupines: Intimacy And Its Dilemmas: Five Stories Of Psychotherapy

“Winnicott’s key word was “mothering,” Lacan’s was “desire.” For Lacan, desire is what simultaneously defines us as human subjects and what prevents us from ever being whole or complete. To desire something, after all, is to lack something. Whereas Winnicott’s tropes tended toward the organic–he spoke of “growth,” “development,” and “maturity”–Lacan’s imagery was more somber. (“The cipher of his mortal destiny” is characteristically Lacanian.) For Win-nicott, only in illness was the self divided, while for Lacan human subjectivity was necessarily divided, because of the existence of the unconscious. No matter how successful we become, no matter how much we are loved, we will always be vulnerable to irrational fears and capable of the most self-defeating acts. As Freud said, we can never be “master of our own house.”
Deborah Anna Luepnitz, Schopenhauer's Porcupines: Intimacy And Its Dilemmas: Five Stories Of Psychotherapy



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Deborah to Goodreads.