,
Thomas R. Trautmann

Thomas R. Trautmann’s Followers (17)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

Thomas R. Trautmann



Average rating: 3.63 · 418 ratings · 59 reviews · 20 distinct worksSimilar authors
India: Brief History of a C...

3.62 avg rating — 179 ratings — published 2010 — 11 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Arthashastra: The Science o...

3.47 avg rating — 72 ratings — published 2012 — 10 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Aryan Debate

3.66 avg rating — 32 ratings — published 2005 — 3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Elephants and Kings: An Env...

3.86 avg rating — 28 ratings — published 2015 — 6 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Aryans and British India

3.63 avg rating — 19 ratings — published 1997 — 6 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Lewis Henry Morgan and the ...

3.67 avg rating — 9 ratings — published 1987 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Languages and Nations: The ...

really liked it 4.00 avg rating — 8 ratings — published 2006 — 9 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Madras School of Orient...

4.20 avg rating — 5 ratings — published 2009
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Clash of Chronologies: ...

4.50 avg rating — 4 ratings3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Dravidian Kinship

liked it 3.00 avg rating — 3 ratings — published 1982 — 2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by Thomas R. Trautmann…
Quotes by Thomas R. Trautmann  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“To claim historical continuity in allotting indigenous or alien status to particular groups in the creation of contemporary identities is unacceptable, for identities are neither permanent, nor unchanging, nor transparent. — Romila Thapar”
Thomas R. Trautmann, Aryans and British India

“In British eyes India presented the spectacle of a dark-skinned people who were evidently civilized, and as such it constituted the central problem for Victorian anthropology, whose project it was to achieve classifications of human variety consistent with the master idea of the opposition of the dark-skinned savage and the fair-skinned civilized European.”
Thomas R. Trautmann, Aryans and British India

“The broader usage of the term Arya is largely due to Friedrich Max Müller, who took the word from Sanskrit and applied it to the family of languages now called Indo-European and the peoples speaking them. As we shall see in the next chapter, the concept of the Indo-European language family had been clearly articulated by Sir William Jones in 1786 as a group of related languages consisting of Sanskrit, Latin, Greek, Gothic, Celtic, and Old Persian, codescended from a lost ancestral language, although he did not give this language family a name. The "original stock" that spoke the ancestral language he simply called Indian or Hindu. In the early nineteenth century the name for the language family and its peoples varied among four main choices. From the Bible narrative of Noah and his three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japhet, came the name Japhetic for this family; unlike the coordinate names Semitic and Hamitic, which are still in use for language families, the name Japhetic did not last long. German philologists preferred "Indo-Germanic," devised by Heinrich Klaproth in 1823 (see Schwab 1984:184), but non-Germans resisted. The English linguist Arthur Young proposed "Indo-European" as early as 1813, and it eventually displaced the other terms (Young 1813). But "Aryan" had a long innings.”
Thomas R. Trautmann, Aryans and British India



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Thomas to Goodreads.