Thomas R. Trautmann
|
India: Brief History of a Civilization
—
published
2010
—
11 editions
|
|
|
Arthashastra: The Science of Wealth
—
published
2012
—
10 editions
|
|
|
The Aryan Debate
—
published
2005
—
3 editions
|
|
|
Elephants and Kings: An Environmental History
—
published
2015
—
6 editions
|
|
|
Aryans and British India
—
published
1997
—
6 editions
|
|
|
Lewis Henry Morgan and the Invention of Kinship
—
published
1987
—
5 editions
|
|
|
Languages and Nations: The Dravidian Proof in Colonial Madras
—
published
2006
—
9 editions
|
|
|
The Madras School of Orientalism
—
published
2009
|
|
|
The Clash of Chronologies: Ancient India in the Modern World
|
|
|
Dravidian Kinship
—
published
1982
—
2 editions
|
|
“To claim historical continuity in allotting indigenous or alien status to particular groups in the creation of contemporary identities is unacceptable, for identities are neither permanent, nor unchanging, nor transparent. — Romila Thapar”
― Aryans and British India
― Aryans and British India
“In British eyes India presented the spectacle of a dark-skinned people who were evidently civilized, and as such it constituted the central problem for Victorian anthropology, whose project it was to achieve classifications of human variety consistent with the master idea of the opposition of the dark-skinned savage and the fair-skinned civilized European.”
― Aryans and British India
― Aryans and British India
“The broader usage of the term Arya is largely due to Friedrich Max Müller, who took the word from Sanskrit and applied it to the family of languages now called Indo-European and the peoples speaking them. As we shall see in the next chapter, the concept of the Indo-European language family had been clearly articulated by Sir William Jones in 1786 as a group of related languages consisting of Sanskrit, Latin, Greek, Gothic, Celtic, and Old Persian, codescended from a lost ancestral language, although he did not give this language family a name. The "original stock" that spoke the ancestral language he simply called Indian or Hindu. In the early nineteenth century the name for the language family and its peoples varied among four main choices. From the Bible narrative of Noah and his three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japhet, came the name Japhetic for this family; unlike the coordinate names Semitic and Hamitic, which are still in use for language families, the name Japhetic did not last long. German philologists preferred "Indo-Germanic," devised by Heinrich Klaproth in 1823 (see Schwab 1984:184), but non-Germans resisted. The English linguist Arthur Young proposed "Indo-European" as early as 1813, and it eventually displaced the other terms (Young 1813). But "Aryan" had a long innings.”
― Aryans and British India
― Aryans and British India
Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Thomas to Goodreads.













