Catharine A. MacKinnon
Born
in Minneapolis, Minnesota, The United States
October 07, 1946
Genre
Influences
|
Toward a Feminist Theory of the State
—
published
1989
—
13 editions
|
|
|
Only Words
—
published
1993
—
11 editions
|
|
|
Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law
—
published
1987
—
10 editions
|
|
|
Are Women Human?: And Other International Dialogues
—
published
2006
—
9 editions
|
|
|
Women's Lives, Men's Laws
—
published
2005
—
6 editions
|
|
|
Butterfly Politics
|
|
|
Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination (Yale Fastback Series)
|
|
|
Liberalism and the Death of Feminism
|
|
|
Sex Equality (University Casebook Series)
—
published
2001
—
3 editions
|
|
|
Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence
|
|
“Men who are in prison for rape think it's the dumbest thing that ever happened... it's isn't just a miscarriage of justice; they were put in jail for something very little different from what most men do most of the time and call it sex. The only difference is they got caught. That view is nonremorseful and not rehabilitative. It may also be true. It seems to me that we have here a convergence between the rapists's view of what he has done and the victim's perspective on what was done to her. That is, for both, their ordinary experiences of heterosexual intercourse and the act of rape have something in common. Now this gets us into immense trouble, because that's exactly how judges and juries see it who refuse to convict men accused of rape. A rape victim has to prove that it was not intercourse. She has to show that there was force and that she resisted, because if there was sex, consent is inferred. Finders of fact look for "more force than usual during the preliminaries". Rape is defined by distinction from intercourse - not nonviolence, intercourse. They ask, does this event look more like fucking or like rape? But what is their standard for sex, and is this question asked from the women's point of view? The level of force is not adjudicated at her point of violation; it is adjudicated at the standard for the normal level of force. Who sets this standard?”
―
―
“Marxism teaches that exploitation and degradation somehow produce resistance and revolution. It's been hard to say why. What I've learned from women's experience with sexuality is that exploitation and degradation produce grateful complicity in exchange for survival. They produce self-loathing to the point of extinction of self, and it is respect for self that makes resistance conceivable.”
― Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law
― Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law
Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Catharine to Goodreads.



























