Alexander R. Galloway

Alexander R. Galloway’s Followers (42)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

Alexander R. Galloway



Average rating: 3.83 · 1,213 ratings · 107 reviews · 23 distinct worksSimilar authors
Protocol: How Control Exist...

3.91 avg rating — 208 ratings — published 2004 — 11 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Gaming: Essays On Algorithm...

3.74 avg rating — 197 ratings — published 2006 — 10 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Interface Effect

3.73 avg rating — 143 ratings — published 2012 — 11 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Exploit: A Theory of Ne...

by
3.86 avg rating — 132 ratings — published 2007 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Laruelle: Against the Digit...

3.71 avg rating — 52 ratings — published 2014 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Excommunication: Three Inqu...

by
3.35 avg rating — 43 ratings — published 2013 — 8 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Les Nouveaux Réalistes

it was ok 2.00 avg rating — 1 rating — published 2012
Rate this book
Clear rating
French Theory Today: An Int...

did not like it 1.00 avg rating — 1 rating
Rate this book
Clear rating
Fillip 18

by
0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
Alexander Galloway. Außer B...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by Alexander R. Galloway…
Quotes by Alexander R. Galloway  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“Although affiliated with materialist philosophy and particularly the historical materialism of Marx, Laruelle’s conception of the real is not simply reducible to a kind of primary matter or empirical reality. He has no interest in debating whether or not the real world exists outside our ability to observe it, or whether or not the real world is constructed out of countless small material atoms. These are the squabbles of philosophy, after all. The real, as non-philosophical, is defined precisely and axiomatically by Laruelle. The real is the unilateral duality specific to an immanent one.”
Alexander R. Galloway, Laruelle: Against the Digital

“Often interfaces are assumed to be synonymous with media itself. But what would it mean to say that “interface” and “media” are two names for the same thing? The answer is found in the remediation or layer model of media, broached already in the introduction, wherein media are essentially nothing but formal containers housing other pieces of media. This is a claim most clearly elaborated on the opening pages of Marshall McLuhan’s Understanding Media. McLuhan liked to articulate this claim in terms of media history: a new medium is invented, and as such its role is as a container for a previous media format. So, film is invented at the tail end of the nineteenth century as a container for photography, music, and various theatrical formats like vaudeville. What is video but a container for film. What is the Web but a container for text, image, video clips, and so on. Like the layers of an onion, one format encircles another, and it is media all the way down. This definition is well-established today, and it is a very short leap from there to the idea of interface, for the interface becomes the point of transition between different mediatic layers within any nested system. The interface is an “agitation” or generative friction between different formats. In computer science, this happens very literally; an “interface” is the name given to the way in which one glob of code can interact with another. Since any given format finds its identity merely in the fact that it is a container for another format, the concept of interface and medium quickly collapse into one and the same thing.”
Alexander R. Galloway

“We are living through a movement from an organic, industrial society to a polymorphous, information system,” wrote Donna Haraway, “from all work to all play, a deadly game.”10 With the growing significance of immaterial labor, and the concomitant increase in cultivation and exploitation of play—creativity, innovation, the new, the singular, flexibility, the supplement—as a productive force, play will become more and more linked to broad social structures of control. Today we are no doubt witnessing the end of play as politically progressive, or even politically neutral.)”
Alexander R. Galloway, Gaming: Essays On Algorithmic Culture



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Alexander to Goodreads.