Peter Swirski

Peter Swirski’s Followers (11)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

Peter Swirski



Average rating: 4.29 · 261 ratings · 98 reviews · 21 distinct works
A Stanislaw Lem Reader

by
3.96 avg rating — 49 ratings — published 1997 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
From Lowbrow to Nobrow

3.89 avg rating — 27 ratings — published 2005 — 4 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
From Literature to Biteratu...

4.17 avg rating — 24 ratings — published 2013 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Art and Science of Stan...

4.13 avg rating — 23 ratings — published 2006 — 6 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Ars Americana, Ars Politica...

4.84 avg rating — 19 ratings — published 2010 — 3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
American Utopia and Social ...

4.68 avg rating — 19 ratings — published 2011 — 12 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
American Crime Fiction: A C...

4.81 avg rating — 16 ratings — published 2016 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Literature, Analytically Sp...

4.69 avg rating — 13 ratings — published 2010 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
American Political Fictions...

4.92 avg rating — 12 ratings — published 2015 — 6 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Stanislaw Lem: Philosopher ...

4.31 avg rating — 13 ratings — published 2015 — 2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by Peter Swirski…
Quotes by Peter Swirski  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“The notion of literature as only one of several avenues to a single type
of propositional knowledge is, of course, hardly the winning ticket in lit-crit today. More typical are sentiments that see such a notion as not even admissible, if at all desirable. The world of these academic refuseniks is, however, a bleak and sterile place. Disarmed by their own epistemic fiat, scholars cannot assert anything since they deny the idea of objective rationality. If they arrive at an insight whose truth they wish to defend – for example that truth and rationality are passé – they can’t do so because truth and rationality are constructed to be constructed.”
Peter Swirski, Of Literature and Knowledge: Explorations in Narrative Thought Experiments, Evolution, and Game Theory



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Peter to Goodreads.