Peter S. Wells
Website
Genre
More books by Peter S. Wells…
“Amid all the variability in responses to the choices presented by the Roman presence, we can recognize significant patterns, and they may represent common features in all situations of interaction between expanding complex societies and indigenous groups. Especially striking is initial eager adoption of Roman luxury goods and lifestyle by the urban elites in the conquered territories, while rural areas and others in the society maintained the traditional Iron Age material culture. Over the course of a few generations, rural communities also began to adopt new patterns, but after another few generations, signs of re-creation, or renewal, of old traditions appeared, perhaps as forms of resistance to provincial Roman material culture and society. Over time, new traditions developed, adapting elements of both indigenous and introduced practices and styles to create patterns different from any of the antecedents.
In the unconquered regions, the patterns are different but related. The elites embraced many aspects of the imperial lifestyle that they consumed and displayed privately, such as ornate feasting paraphernalia, statuary, personal ornaments, and coins, but they did not adopt the public expressions of their affiliation with the cosmopolitan society - the dwellings, baths, or temples of the Roman provinces. Except near the frontiers, as at the site of Westick, the nonelite members of the societies beyond the frontier did not adopt the new cosmopolitan styles, probably because they had no direct access to the required goods. Beyond the frontier we see no clear resurgence of long-dormant styles, as in the case of the La Tene style in the provinces. When elements of the cosmopolitan lifestyle were integrated with those of local tradition, such as in the emergence of the confederations of the Alamanni and the Franks, that development was driven more exclusively by the elites than was the case in the Roman provinces.”
― The Barbarians Speak: How the Conquered Peoples Shaped Roman Europe
In the unconquered regions, the patterns are different but related. The elites embraced many aspects of the imperial lifestyle that they consumed and displayed privately, such as ornate feasting paraphernalia, statuary, personal ornaments, and coins, but they did not adopt the public expressions of their affiliation with the cosmopolitan society - the dwellings, baths, or temples of the Roman provinces. Except near the frontiers, as at the site of Westick, the nonelite members of the societies beyond the frontier did not adopt the new cosmopolitan styles, probably because they had no direct access to the required goods. Beyond the frontier we see no clear resurgence of long-dormant styles, as in the case of the La Tene style in the provinces. When elements of the cosmopolitan lifestyle were integrated with those of local tradition, such as in the emergence of the confederations of the Alamanni and the Franks, that development was driven more exclusively by the elites than was the case in the Roman provinces.”
― The Barbarians Speak: How the Conquered Peoples Shaped Roman Europe
Topics Mentioning This Author
| topics | posts | views | last activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
The Seasonal Read...:
Spring Challenge 2011 Completed Tasks (DO NOT DELETE ANY POSTS)
|
2867 | 1116 | May 31, 2011 09:01PM | |
| The History Book ...: RADIAH'S 50 BOOKS READ IN 2015 | 100 | 155 | Dec 26, 2015 04:53AM | |
| The History Book ...: SPQR - A HISTORY OF ANCIENT ROME - BIBLIOGRAPHY ~ Spoiler Thread | 25 | 87 | Jun 17, 2017 02:13PM | |
| The History Book ...: CAESAR - BIBLIOGRAPHY - Spoiler Thread | 36 | 50 | Apr 12, 2018 01:48PM | |
| The History Book ...: EARLY MIDDLE AGES | 123 | 443 | Apr 24, 2025 12:32PM |
Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Peter to Goodreads.















