J. Eric Oliver

J. Eric Oliver’s Followers (12)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

J. Eric Oliver


Website

Twitter

Genre


Eric Oliver is a Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago, and studies American politics, public opinion, political psychology, local politics, racial attitudes, and the politics of science.

His current research examines why people believe in conspiracy theories, why liberals and conservatives name their children differently, why 2016 was a populist election, and what is changing in America's democracy.

His latest book, Enchanted America: The Struggle between Reason and Intuition in US Politics (publication in September 2018), argues that the major political divisions in America right now are not between liberals and conservatives, but between "intuitionists" and "rationalists."
...more

Average rating: 3.69 · 337 ratings · 49 reviews · 8 distinct worksSimilar authors
Fat Politics: The Real Stor...

3.66 avg rating — 233 ratings — published 2005 — 9 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Enchanted America: The Stru...

3.84 avg rating — 44 ratings — published 2018 — 3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
How To Know Your Self: The ...

4.35 avg rating — 20 ratings2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Local Elections and the Pol...

by
3.53 avg rating — 19 ratings — published 2012 — 7 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Democracy in Suburbia.

3.29 avg rating — 14 ratings — published 2001 — 8 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Paradoxes of Integratio...

really liked it 4.00 avg rating — 6 ratings — published 2010 — 6 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Atlas of the 2008 Elections

by
2.33 avg rating — 3 ratings — published 2011 — 4 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
How to Know Your Self: The ...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by J. Eric Oliver…
Quotes by J. Eric Oliver  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“The approach of The Authoritarian Personality overlaps quite a bit with our theories of intuitive politics. As with magical thinking, authoritarianism is a nonrational way of viewing the world. It is based more on gut feelings, albeit rather dark ones, than on general principles. Like Intuitionists, authoritarians hold Manichaean notions of good and evil, believe strongly in rigid gender roles and immanent justice, and are intolerant of ambiguity and abstract thinking.13 Even more striking is the importance of anxiety. Just like magical beliefs, authoritarianism appears to be largely triggered by feelings of threat. There is strong evidence that authoritarianism is a latent predisposition that gets activated in stressful circumstances.”
J. Eric Oliver, Enchanted America: How Intuition & Reason Divide Our Politics

“Intuitionists are people who rely heavily on their intuitions when making judgments. They have a lot of magical beliefs. They interpret the world through their emotions, taking their own apprehensions and fears as indicative that something truly is amiss. To resolve this apprehension, they are drawn to symbols and metaphors. Their reliance on their emotions also gives them a narcissistic worldview. It is their feelings that determine the significance of any event, be it natural or man-made. For Intuitionists, the same God that created the universe is also engrossed with their innermost thoughts and deeds. They are at the apex of history, the protagonists of a great cosmic drama. They view politics from their own feelings and infantile longings rather than from dispassionate analysis of world events. They are less concerned with the technicalities of governance and more animated by the visceral issues that stoke their anxieties. In politics, they are drawn to easy solutions, evocative symbols, and the conspiratorial musings of demagogues. In other words, Americans’ political opinions are determined not simply by ideologies or abstract values but by how much they rely on their intuitive processes for comprehending the world.”
J. Eric Oliver, Enchanted America: How Intuition & Reason Divide Our Politics

“It is worth pausing for a moment to reflect on these differences. Recall that our measures of Intuitionism are based on sets of behaviors that have nothing to do with politics. Intuitionists are not simply apprehensive people who are drawn to metaphors, but people who translate these tendencies into a number of beliefs that defy basic scientific logic. And this way of thinking is becoming increasingly aligned with one’s ideological self-description. Only a tiny fraction of Americans calling themselves very conservative do not hold a least some magical beliefs; an overwhelming majority of strong conservatives are also very strong magical thinkers.36 To be very conservative in America is, almost certainly, to be someone who has a strong Intuitionist worldview. These differences are important for US politics. Not only are liberals disproportionately Democrat in their party identification, they are disproportionately Rationalist in their worldview. Where liberals do hold higher levels of magical beliefs, they tend to be non-Christian ones like horoscopes or reincarnation. Conservatives, meanwhile, are not only more likely to be Republican, they are more likely to be strongly Intuitionist. The Rationalist conservatives who attend talks at the Cato Institute or subscribe to Reason magazine are a small minority on the political Right. Indeed, it’s the rare American who identifies as a strong conservative who doesn’t hold a lot of Christian magical beliefs. Conservatism and magical thinking, especially within religious fundamentalism, are increasingly becoming aligned. And as we’ll see in chapter 4, this alignment between Intuitionism and ideology is behind much of the polarization in US politics.”
J. Eric Oliver, Enchanted America: How Intuition & Reason Divide Our Politics



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite J. to Goodreads.