Matthew Calarco

Matthew Calarco’s Followers (8)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

Matthew Calarco


Genre


Matthew Calarco is Associate Professor of Philosophy at California State University Fullerton, USA.

Average rating: 4.07 · 296 ratings · 29 reviews · 18 distinct worksSimilar authors
Zoographies: The Question o...

4.01 avg rating — 88 ratings — published 2008 — 8 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Thinking Through Animals: I...

4.15 avg rating — 61 ratings — published 2015 — 3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Giorgio Agamben: Sovereignt...

by
3.96 avg rating — 27 ratings — published 2007 — 3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Beyond the Anthropological ...

4.75 avg rating — 8 ratings4 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Boundaries of Human Nat...

really liked it 4.00 avg rating — 6 ratings3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Continental Ethics Reader

4.40 avg rating — 5 ratings — published 2003 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Three Ethologies: A Pos...

4.40 avg rating — 5 ratings3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Reflections on Roadkill bet...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Zoographies:Publisher: Colu...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
How Not to Be Human: The In...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by Matthew Calarco…
Quotes by Matthew Calarco  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“In biologist Stephen Jay Gould’s illustrative phrase, human beings should be seen as a “tiny, late-arising twig on life’s enormously arborescent bush.”14 That”
Matthew Calarco, Thinking Through Animals: Identity, Difference, Indistinction

“philosophers of difference are, in fact, hyperethical and radical political thinkers, concerned with how movements that seek to address marginalization need to become even more ethical, even more radical in their desire to change the status quo in view of justice.”
Matthew Calarco, Thinking Through Animals: Identity, Difference, Indistinction

“To my mind, the chief conclusion to be drawn from Derrida’s analysis is that the human-animal distinction is, strictly speaking, nonsensical. How could a simple (or even a highly refined) binary distinction approach doing justice to the complex ethical and ontological matters at stake here?”
Matthew Calarco, Zoographies: The Question of the Animal from Heidegger to Derrida



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Matthew to Goodreads.