T. Mills Kelly

T. Mills Kelly’s Followers (1)

member photo

T. Mills Kelly



Average rating: 4.06 · 31 ratings · 20 reviews · 10 distinct works
Teaching History in the Dig...

4.06 avg rating — 31 ratings — published 2013 — 9 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Without Remorse: Czech Nati...

by
0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings — published 2007 — 2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
LAST BEST CHANCE OR LAST GA...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
Ways of the World with Sour...

by
0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings — published 2010
Rate this book
Clear rating
World History Matters: A St...

by
0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings — published 2008 — 2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
History of World Societies ...

by
0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings — published 2008
Rate this book
Clear rating
History of World Societies ...

by
0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings — published 2008
Rate this book
Clear rating
History of World Societies ...

by
0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings — published 2008
Rate this book
Clear rating
Understanding World Societi...

by
0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings — published 2012
Rate this book
Clear rating
Geschichtsunterricht im 21....

by
0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by T. Mills Kelly…
Quotes by T. Mills Kelly  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“Almost every historian has his or her own personal list of the characteristics of historical thinking, but abilities that come up again and again are: 1. The ability to tell the difference between a primary and a secondary source. 2. The ability to “source the source”; that is, figure out who created the source, when it was created, and so on. 3. The ability to obtain information about the authority of the source and to assess that authority in light of other evidence. 4. The ability to set sources in their proper chronological order and to understand why that ordering is important. 5. The ability to construct an original argument based upon evidence from various sources. 6. The ability to recognize the strangeness of the past without being put off by that strangeness. 7. The ability to make comparative judgments about evidence. 8. The ability to recognize what one does not or cannot know from the evidence at hand. 9. The ability to understand that events are understood differently by different people. 10. The ability to triangulate between and among sources. 11. The ability to ask probing questions—not just what happened, but why did it happen this way and why didn't it happen that way? 12. The ability to recognize the role of causality. 13. The ability to critique evidence both on its own terms and in terms of its value to a larger analytical project. 14. The ability to recognize lines of argument in historical thought. 15. The ability to present the past in clear ways, whether in writing or in other media, saying what can be said and not saying what cannot.”
T. Mills Kelly, Teaching History in the Digital Age



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite T. to Goodreads.