Jane F. Gardner

Jane F. Gardner’s Followers (5)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

Jane F. Gardner



Average rating: 4.05 · 16,045 ratings · 475 reviews · 29 distinct worksSimilar authors
Roman Myths

3.20 avg rating — 112 ratings — published 1993 — 15 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Women in Roman Law and Society

3.75 avg rating — 40 ratings — published 1987 — 24 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Roman Household: A Sour...

3.84 avg rating — 19 ratings — published 1991 — 11 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Mythes romains

liked it 3.00 avg rating — 8 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
Being a Roman Citizen

4.40 avg rating — 5 ratings — published 1993 — 11 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Family and Familia in Roman...

4.50 avg rating — 2 ratings — published 1998 — 2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Leadership and the cult of ...

it was amazing 5.00 avg rating — 1 rating — published 1974 — 4 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Representing the Body of th...

by
it was amazing 5.00 avg rating — 1 rating — published 2013 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Römische Mythen.

really liked it 4.00 avg rating — 1 rating
Rate this book
Clear rating
Ostoorehaye Rumi (Roman Myt...

by
0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by Jane F. Gardner…
Quotes by Jane F. Gardner  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“Pomponius’ revealing choice of words (D. 1.6.9.1): ‘In public matters, the son in power is regarded as equivalent to a paterfamilias.’ The Romans knew perfectly well that a magistrate with a living father was not really a paterfamilias. This resort to a legal fiction to justify his exercise of authority seems to reveal an underlying, probably ancient, concept of citizenship in which the citizens, in the fullest sense of the word, were those who alone were entitled to transact independently and on a basis of equality in matters both public and private with other citizens—in other words, the patres, heads of household.”
Jane F. Gardner, Being a Roman Citizen

“in early Rome and for much of the Republic, women were commonly married with manus; that is, they passed from the power of their fathers into that of their husbands (who certainly could not be held liable for obligations contracted while a woman was under another’s power), or even, if unmarried at their fathers’ death, became briefly sui iuris and then passed into power again; remarriage of widows was also regular.”
Jane F. Gardner, Being a Roman Citizen

“Daughters, who had no part in military service of the state, were not included. However, women sui iuris had not the franchise either, since they were not heads of household in the fullest sense, having no potestas over children, and over property a potestas that was limited by restraints, originally far-reaching, over their ability of control and disposal (details in Gardner 1986:14–22). They were ‘heads of household’ only in a very limited sense. Restraints on women’s legal capacity will be discussed in the next chapter.”
Jane F. Gardner, Being a Roman Citizen

Topics Mentioning This Author

topics posts views last activity  
The History Book ...: SERIES - BIBLIOGRAPHY - SPOILER THREAD 54 177 Feb 27, 2013 02:16PM  
The History Book ...: SPQR - A HISTORY OF ANCIENT ROME - BIBLIOGRAPHY ~ Spoiler Thread 25 89 Jun 17, 2017 02:13PM  
The History Book ...: * THE CONSTITUTION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE 18 312 May 16, 2020 06:30PM  
The History Book ...: * CLASSICAL ANTIQUITY 537 1468 Dec 05, 2025 07:06AM  


Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Jane to Goodreads.