Philip R. Davies

Philip R. Davies’s Followers (6)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

Philip R. Davies



Average rating: 3.79 · 229 ratings · 35 reviews · 61 distinct works
The Complete World of The D...

by
3.74 avg rating — 90 ratings — published 2002 — 9 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Memories of Ancient Israel:...

3.80 avg rating — 25 ratings — published 2008 — 2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
In Search of 'Ancient Israel'

3.72 avg rating — 25 ratings — published 1992 — 9 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Old Testament World

by
3.63 avg rating — 16 ratings — published 1989 — 11 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Scribes and Schools: The Ca...

3.77 avg rating — 13 ratings — published 1998 — 3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Whose Bible Is It Anyway?

4.43 avg rating — 7 ratings — published 1995 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The History of Ancient Isra...

2.78 avg rating — 9 ratings — published 2015 — 4 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Daniel

3.25 avg rating — 4 ratings — published 1985 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Behind the Essenes: History...

3.33 avg rating — 3 ratings — published 1987 — 3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Origins of Biblical Israel

it was amazing 5.00 avg rating — 2 ratings5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by Philip R. Davies…
Quotes by Philip R. Davies  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“In all these cases, we find that because of the way ancient writers write about, and rewrite, the past, it is often impossible to tell the difference between what we would call history on the one hand and midrash, legend, or expansion on the other. Perhaps the distinction is our problem: perhaps for ancient readers the notion of what really happened is not crucial.”
Philip R. Davies, Memories of Ancient Israel: An Introduction to Biblical History--Ancient and Modern

“What matters is that these things are allowed to stand in the text without resolution. The discrepancies either were not noticed (which seems unlikely) or were not bothered about. Either way, we learn something about the extent to which biblical
historians are punctilious about facts. They are not-at least not in the way we are. Contradictions are allowed to stand, details are embellished without any basis in historical knowledge. Are these writers bad or careless historians, or are we reading them wrongly and failing to share their understanding of the past?”
Philip R. Davies, Memories of Ancient Israel: An Introduction to Biblical History--Ancient and Modern



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Philip to Goodreads.