Sandra G. Harding
Born
March 29, 1935
Died
March 06, 2025
![]() |
Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women's Lives
6 editions
—
published
1991
—
|
|
![]() |
The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies
6 editions
—
published
2003
—
|
|
![]() |
The Science Question in Feminism
14 editions
—
published
1986
—
|
|
![]() |
Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies
7 editions
—
published
1991
—
|
|
![]() |
Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues
14 editions
—
published
1987
—
|
|
![]() |
Objectivity and Diversity: Another Logic of Scientific Research
4 editions
—
published
2015
—
|
|
![]() |
Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities
8 editions
—
published
2008
—
|
|
![]() |
The "Racial" Economy of Science: Toward a Democratic Future
8 editions
—
published
1993
—
|
|
![]() |
Science and Social Inequality: Feminist and Postcolonial Issues
5 editions
—
published
2006
—
|
|
![]() |
The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader
8 editions
—
published
2011
—
|
|
“By exceptionalism I mean the belief that Western sciences alone among all human knowledge systems are capable of grasping reality in its own terms—“cutting nature at its joints,” as philosophers of science typically enjoy referring to the matter. According to this view, only modern Western sciences have demonstrated that they have the resources to escape the universal human tendency to project onto nature cultural assumptions, fears, and desires. Indeed, these research projects alone of all human inquiries into natural and social orders are entitled to be called sciences, according to the defenders of exceptionalism. Critics document just how such exceptionalists conflate Science with science. That is, the exceptionalists conflate the West’s idealized understandings of its own practices with the universal human impulse to understand ourselves and the world around us in ways that permit effective interactions with such worlds. In contrast, the critics argue that “all people operate within the domains of magic, science, and religion” (Malinowski, Magic 196; quoted by Nader, Naked Science 5). Modern Western sciences are just one set of sciences today, albeit powerful ones, among the many others that have existed and do today around the globe. Moreover they are not constituted entirely by Europeans or within European civilizations; in fact they owe great debts, mostly unacknowledged, to the science traditions that preceded them,”
― Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities
― Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities
“Critical discussions of Western colonialism and imperialism and of what the term postcolonialism could mean, require, and enable first became acceptable in literature and cultural studies departments in the United States some three decades ago. Yet it has been much harder to create such discussions of sciences and technologies. Especially resistant are those departments where the West's scientific rationality and technical expertise have long been lovingly explained and "served up" for use in corporate and nationalist policies: sociology, philosophy, economics, and international relations, as well as the natural sciences themselves.”
― The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader
― The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader
“...it is inevitable that women will be victimized by the sciences and their technologies in a society such as ours where women have little power, where almost all scientific research is technology-driven, and here political issues are posed as requiring merely technological "solutions".”
―
―