Michael C. Munger
![]() |
Tomorrow 3.0: Transaction Costs and the Sharing Economy (Cambridge Studies in Economics, Choice, and Society)
6 editions
—
published
2018
—
|
|
![]() |
Is Capitalism Sustainable?
2 editions
—
published
2019
—
|
|
![]() |
The Thing Itself: Essays on Academics and the State
by
2 editions
—
published
2015
—
|
|
![]() |
Analyzing Policy: Choices, Conflicts, and Practices
4 editions
—
published
2000
—
|
|
![]() |
Choosing in Groups: Analytical Politics Revisited
by
6 editions
—
published
2014
—
|
|
![]() |
Analytical Politics
by
12 editions
—
published
1997
—
|
|
![]() |
Scaling The Ivory Tower: The Pursuit Of An Academic Career
by |
|
![]() |
Future: Economic Peril or Prosperity? (Independent Institiute Studies in Political Economy)
by |
|
![]() |
Is Limited Government Possible? (Cato Unbound Book 22008)
by
—
published
2008
|
|
![]() |
Is Social Justice Just?
by |
|
“The role of democracy is not to banish disagreement but rather to prevent political disagreements from devolving into armed conflict.”
― The Thing Itself: Essays on Academics and the State
― The Thing Itself: Essays on Academics and the State
“There is a tendency among regulators to act like Adam Smith’s “Man of System,” moving objects around on a chess board. The man of system … is often so enamoured with the supposed beauty of his own ideal plan of government, that he cannot suffer the smallest deviation from any part of it.… He seems to imagine that he can arrange the different members of a great society with as much ease as the hand arranges the different pieces upon a chess-board. He does not consider that the pieces upon the chess-board have no other principle of motion besides that which the hand impresses upon them; but that, in the great chess-board of human society, every single piece has a principle of motion of its own, altogether different from that which the legislature might choose to impress upon it. If those two principles … are opposite or different, the game will go on miserably. (Smith, 1759; pp. 233-234) The “game” may be hockey or public policy; the insight is the same. Unintended consequences may reduce, or even eliminate, the good you expect to result from a policy change. People aren’t chess pieces.”
― Is Capitalism Sustainable?
― Is Capitalism Sustainable?
“There are more people now with wireless connections than with flush toilets, according to the United Nations (2013).”
― Tomorrow 3.0: Transaction Costs and the Sharing Economy
― Tomorrow 3.0: Transaction Costs and the Sharing Economy
Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Michael to Goodreads.