Robert E. Buswell Jr.
Website
|
The Princeton Dictionary of Buddhism
by
—
published
2013
—
3 editions
|
|
|
The Zen Monastic Experience
—
published
1992
—
7 editions
|
|
|
Tracing Back the Radiance: Chinul's Korean Way of Zen (Kuroda Classics in East Asian Buddhism, 2)
—
published
1991
—
5 editions
|
|
|
Religions of Korea in Practice
—
published
2006
—
5 editions
|
|
|
Encyclopedia of Buddhism
—
published
2003
—
3 editions
|
|
|
Christianity in Korea
—
published
2005
—
3 editions
|
|
|
Currents And Countercurrents: Korean Influences On The East Asian Buddhist Traditions
—
published
2005
—
4 editions
|
|
|
Paths to Liberation: The Marga and Its Transformations in Buddhist Thought
—
published
1990
|
|
|
Cultivating Original Enlightenment: Wohnyo's Exposition of the Vajrasamadhi-Sutra (Kumgang Sammaegyong Non)
—
published
2007
—
2 editions
|
|
|
The Formation of Ch'an Ideology in China and Korea: The Vajrasamadhi-Sutra, a Buddhist Apocryphon
—
published
1989
—
4 editions
|
|
“It is three in the morning and another day has begun at the Korean Buddhist monastery of Songwang-sa.”
― The Zen Monastic Experience
― The Zen Monastic Experience
“Zen is not coextensive with any one school, whether that be Korean Sŏn or Japanese Rinzai Zen. There have actually been many independent strands of what has come to be called Zen, the sorting out of which has occupied scholars of Buddhism for the last few decades. These sectarian divisions are further complicated by the fact that there are Zen traditions in all four East Asian countries—China, Korea, Japan, and Vietnam—each of which has its own independent history, doctrine, and mode of practice. While each of these traditions has developed independently, all have been heavily influenced by the Chinese schools of Ch'an (Kor. Sŏn; Jpn. Zen; Viet. Thiên). We are therefore left with an intricate picture of several independent national traditions of Zen, but traditions that do have considerable synergy between them. To ignore these national differences would be to oversimplify the complicated sectarian scene that is East Asian Zen; but to overemphasize them would be to ignore the multiple layers of symbiosis between Zen's various national branches. These continuities and transformations between the different strands must both be kept in mind in order to understand the character of the "Zen tradition.”
― The Zen Monastic Experience
― The Zen Monastic Experience
“The foundation of the Chosŏn dynasty (1392- 1910), with its pronounced Neo-Confucian sympathies, brought an end to Buddhism's hegemony in Korean religion and upset this ideological status quo. Buddhism's close affiliation with the vanquished Koryŏ rulers led to centuries of persecution during this Confucian dynasty. While controls over monastic vocations and conduct had already been instituted during the Koryŏ period, these pale next to the severe restrictions promulgated during the Chosŏn dynasty. The number of monks was severely restricted—and at times a complete ban on ordination instituted—and monks were prohibited from entering the metropolitan areas. Hundreds of monasteries were disestablished (the number of temples dropping to 242 during the reign of T'aejong [r. 1401-1418]), and new construction was forbidden in the cities and villages of Korea. Monastic land holdings and temple slaves were confiscated by the government in 1406, undermining the economic viability of many monasteries. The vast power that Buddhists had wielded during the Silla and Koryŏ dynasties was now exerted by Confucians. Buddhism was kept virtually quarantined in the countryside, isolated from the intellectual debates of the times. Its lay adherents were more commonly the illiterate peasants of the countryside and women, rather than the educated male elite of the cities, as had been the case in ages past. Buddhism had become insular, and ineffective in generating creative responses to this Confucian challenge.”
― The Zen Monastic Experience
― The Zen Monastic Experience
Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Robert to Goodreads.








