Charles Hall

Charles Hall’s Followers (5)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

Charles Hall



Average rating: 4.03 · 178 ratings · 15 reviews · 88 distinct worksSimilar authors
Sea Fort (Jack Crane Book 2)

3.53 avg rating — 45 ratings — published 2013 — 4 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Why And How Of Auditing...

4.50 avg rating — 26 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
Audit Risk Assessment Made ...

4.75 avg rating — 20 ratings2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Little Book of Local Go...

4.43 avg rating — 21 ratings — published 2014 — 2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Bad Faces (Jack Crane #1)

3.92 avg rating — 12 ratings — published 2011 — 3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
MEGATON MORNINGS

4.14 avg rating — 7 ratings — published 1993 — 2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Preparation of Financial St...

4.67 avg rating — 3 ratings5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Paul Nash-Aerial Creatures

4.50 avg rating — 2 ratings — published 1996 — 2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Sherlock Holmes collect...

4.50 avg rating — 2 ratings — published 1987
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Stealers

1.50 avg rating — 6 ratings — published 15
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by Charles Hall…
Quotes by Charles Hall  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“AICPA peer review checklists are free and can be obtained by Googling “AICPA Peer Review Checklist.” Use the most recent checklist (they often change). Minimum Documentation SSARS 21 states that the minimum documentation requirements are as follows: Establish your firm’s minimum work paper documentation. What work papers are required for each type of engagement? Will your firm require the preparer to sign off on each work paper? When the partner or manager reviews the work papers, will she initial each reviewed work paper or just a summary review sheet? Authority to Issue Determine who has the authority to issue financial statements and compilation reports. Here are a few questions to consider: •Who has authority to issue financial statements using the preparation guidance? •Who has authority to issue financial statements using the compilation guidance? •Will your firm require a second partner review of each initial preparation engagement? •Will annual compilation reports be reviewed by a second partner? Quality Control - A Simple Summary •Well-designed templates will: ·Enhance your firm’s compliance with professional standards, and ·Increase your efficiency •Create templates for those work products that you expect to issue most often (e.g., tax-basis preparation financial statements) •In developing your templates: ·Include the minimum required work papers and reports ·Vet your templates using the AICPA peer review checklists •Determine who has the authority to issue different work products (e.g., preparation, compilation, monthly, annual)”
Charles Hall, Preparation of Financial Statements & Compilation Engagements

“Are there any other situations where AR-C 70 does not apply? Yes. The AICPA’s Center for Plain English Accounting addressed this question in the following question and answer: Q: If financial statements are prepared by the accountant as a by-product [author’s emphasis] of another engagement (for example, an engagement to prepare a tax return), is the accountant required to follow section 70 of SSARS No. 21 and include any special disclaimer or “no assurance” statement on those financial statements? A: No. The accountant is only required to perform the preparation engagement in accordance with section 70 of SSARS No. 21 when engaged [author’s emphasis] to prepare financial statements. Therefore, because the accountant”
Charles Hall, Preparation of Financial Statements & Compilation Engagements

“Peer Reviews Many accountants are asking whether preparation of financial statement engagements trigger a peer review requirement. Here are three questions and answers to help clarify whether your CPA firm is subject to peer review. Question 1 Are public accounting firms required to participate in a peer review program if they only issue financial statements using the preparation guidance in SSARS 21? Based on the AICPA’s rules, the answer is no. But check with your state board of accountancy. Some states require participation in a peer review program even if the AICPA does not. Question 2 If my firm participates in a peer review program, will the financial statement work performed under the preparation guidance be subject to potential review? Yes, the financial statements prepared using the preparation guidance will be included in the scope of the peer review. Question 3 Will compilations be included in peer reviews? Yes. When a peer review is performed, compilations will be included in the scope of the engagement. The issuance of a compilation report does trigger the requirement for a peer review. AICPA Guidance The February 2015 Peer Review Update, a monthly AICPA newsletter, included the following: “On November 18, 2014, the Peer Review Board (PRB) issued an exposure draft, which proposed that firms that only perform preparation engagements under AR-C Section 70 – Preparation of Financial Statements (issued as part of Statement on Standards for Accounting and Review Services (SSARS) No. 21, Statement on Standards for Accounting and Review Services: Clarification and Recodification) would not be required to enroll in the AICPA peer review program (Program). However, it also proposed that a firm’s preparation engagements would be included in the scope of a peer review when the firm either elects to enroll in the program (e.g., to comply with licensing or other requirements) or is already enrolled due to other engagements it performs. This proposal was issued in order to address the effect of these engagements on the scope of the Program. The PRB considered comments raised by the peer review community about the proposal and elected to adopt the proposed guidance changes. The changes are effective for peer reviews commencing on or after February 1, 2015.” Tracking Preparation of Financial Statement Engagements Since the preparation service will be included in the scope of peer reviews, consider that firms enrolled in a peer review program need to track the number of preparation services provided. Otherwise, the peer reviewer will not be able to determine the firm’s mix of work; the peer reviewer uses the total population of a firm’s work to select the sample of engagements to be reviewed. Create a method to track financial statement engagements performed under the preparation standard as early as possible. Peer reviews commencing on or after February 1, 2015, are to include preparation engagements. Given the nature of the preparation service—one that gets turned around quickly—it would be easy for a firm to lose track of how many financial statements were issued using this option. Peer Reviews - A Simple Summary •According to AICPA rules, firms that only perform preparation of financial statement services are not required to enroll in the AICPA peer review program (check with your state board of accountancy to see if their rules are different) •For accounting firms subject to peer review, preparation engagements will be included in the scope of peer reviews •Set up a method to track your preparation engagements; peer reviewers need to know how many preparation engagements your firm issues”
Charles Hall, Preparation of Financial Statements & Compilation Engagements



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Charles to Goodreads.