Diane Vaughan

Diane Vaughan’s Followers (13)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

Diane Vaughan



Average rating: 4.09 · 821 ratings · 126 reviews · 16 distinct worksSimilar authors
The Challenger Launch Decis...

4.08 avg rating — 446 ratings — published 1996 — 13 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Uncoupling: Turning Points ...

4.09 avg rating — 287 ratings — published 1986 — 15 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Dead Reckoning: Air Traffic...

4.21 avg rating — 19 ratings3 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Controlling Unlawful Organi...

4.08 avg rating — 12 ratings — published 1985 — 4 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Sztuka zrywania. Jak rozpad...

4.50 avg rating — 2 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
Mémoires d'une ex-palladist...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
Wenn Liebe keine Zukunft ha...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
Wenn Liebe keine Zukunft ha...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
[Controlling Unlawful Organ...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
By Diane Vaughan Controllin...

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by Diane Vaughan…
Quotes by Diane Vaughan  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“Mourning is essential to uncoupling, as it is to any significant leavetaking. Uncoupling is a transition into a different lifestyle, a change of life course which, whether we recognize and admit it in the early phases or not, is going to be made without the other person. We commit ourselves to relationships expecting them to last, however. In leaving behind a significant person who shares a portion of our life, we experience a loss.”
Diane Vaughan, Uncoupling: Turning Points in Intimate Relationships

“To speak of a communication failure implies a breakdown of some sort. Yet this does not accurately portray what occurs. In truth, communication difficulties arise not from breakdown but from the characteristics of the system itself. Despite promising beginnings in our intimate relationships, we tend over time to evolve a system of communication that suppresses rather than reveals information. Life is complicated, and confirming or disconfirming the well-being of a relationship takes effort. Once we are comfortably coupled, the intense, energy-consuming monitoring of courtship days is replaced by a simpler, more efficient method. Unable to witness our partners’ every activity or verify every nuance of meaning, we evolve a communication system based on trust. We gradually cease our attentive probing, relying instead on familiar cues and signals to stand as testament to the strength of the bond: the words “I love you,” holidays with the family, good sex, special times with shared friends, the routine exchange, “How was your day?” We take these signals as representative of the relationship and turn our monitoring energies elsewhere.
...
Not only do the initiator’s negative signals tend to become incorporated into the existing routine, but, paradoxically, the initiator actively contributes to the impression that life goes on as usual. Even as they express their unhappiness, initiators work at emphasizing and maintaining the routine aspects of life with the other person, simultaneously giving signals that all is well. Unwilling to leave the relationship yet, they need to privately explore and evaluate the situation. The initiator thus contrives an appearance of participation,7 creating a protective cover that allows them to “return” if their alternative resources do not work out.
Our ability to do this—to perform a role we are no longer enthusiastically committed to—is one of our acquired talents. In all our encounters, we present ourselves to others in much the same way as actors do, tailoring our performance to the role we are assigned in a particular setting.8 Thus, communication is always distorted. We only give up fragments of what really occurs within us during that specific moment of communication.9 Such fragments are always selected and arranged so that there is seldom a faithful presentation of our inner reality. It is transformed, reduced, redirected, recomposed.10 Once we get the role perfected, we are able to play it whether we are in the mood to go on stage or not, simply by reproducing the signals.
What is true of all our encounters is, of course, true of intimate relationships. The nature of the intimate bond is especially hard to confirm or disconfirm.11 The signals produced by each partner, while acting out the partner role, tend to be interpreted by the other as the relationship.12 Because the costs of constantly checking out what the other person is feeling and doing are high, each partner is in a position to be duped and misled by the other.13 Thus, the initiator is able to keep up appearances that all is well by falsifying, tailoring, and manipulating signals to that effect. The normal routine can be used to attest to the presence of something that is not there. For example, initiators can continue the habit of saying, “I love you,” though the passion is gone. They can say, “I love you” and cover the fact that they feel disappointment or anger, or that they feel nothing at all. Or, they can say, “I love you” and mean, “I like you,” or, “We have been through a lot together,” or even “Today was a good day.”
Diane Vaughan, Uncoupling: Turning Points in Intimate Relationships

“We just remained very calm and for the first time talked about separating. We spent like a month and a half together after that, and then moved out simultaneously from the apartment to different places on the same day. We even said, look, you know, you’re not going to leave me, I’m not going to leave you. we’ll just move out on the same day. It was apparent that we were both ready to do this. When the time came I helped her move some of her things and she helped me move some of my things. The feeling between us was almost like lovers who for some reason had to leave each other. The night that we said goodbye—it was like 11 o’clock and the house was empty. Everything had been put into trucks and moved and so forth and we were in the house and there was no place else to go and so we sat down on the floor and laying down on the floor in our overcoats and I held her and we both cried and it was just heartrending and then we just separated and that was pretty much it. [SUPERVISOR, AGE 38, DIVORCED AFTER 19 YEARS]”
Diane Vaughan, Uncoupling: Turning Points in Intimate Relationships

Topics Mentioning This Author

topics posts views last activity  
What's the Name o...: SOLVED. Non fiction book of interviews with people whose relationships ended [s] 4 22 Nov 09, 2015 01:34PM  
Aussie Readers: **Spring Challenge: Opposites Attract!** 225 194 Jan 02, 2025 12:02AM  
Aussie Readers: Annual A - Z Authors 2024 325 254 Jan 05, 2025 08:41PM  


Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Diane to Goodreads.