M. Chris Fabricant

M. Chris Fabricant’s Followers (11)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo

M. Chris Fabricant



Average rating: 4.07 · 919 ratings · 174 reviews · 2 distinct worksSimilar authors
Junk Science and the Americ...

4.07 avg rating — 890 ratings — published 2022 — 9 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Busted!: Drug War Survival ...

by
4.28 avg rating — 29 ratings — published 2005 — 10 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating

* Note: these are all the books on Goodreads for this author. To add more, click here.

Quotes by M. Chris Fabricant  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“Scientifically illiterate case law like this obviates the need for rigorous research in forensics. Few traditional forensic techniques have useful applications outside of the justice system and, as a result, once courts allow a technique to be used, there is no real incentive to conduct research—or even test the abilities of putative experts. Why conduct research on a technique that has already been accepted in court, the only place it matters?”
M. Chris Fabricant, Junk Science and the American Criminal Justice System

“Essentially, the Marx opinion created an “eyeball test” for in-court evaluation of forensic evidence, shifting the responsibility of exposing flawed expert testimony to defense attorneys—through the “crucible” of cross-examination—and relying on lay jurors to separate science from nonsense.”
M. Chris Fabricant, Junk Science and the American Criminal Justice System

“a five-part test to apply before “scientific” evidence can be admitted: 1) the evidence must have a hypothesis that has been (and is capable of) being tested—ipse dixit was out, in other words; 2) there must be peer-reviewed literature demonstrating the technique has been “subject to the scrutiny of the scientific community”; 3) there must be an error rate; 4) practitioners must abide by controlling standards; and 5) in a nod to Frye, acceptance in the scientific community is considered, but no longer controls.”
M. Chris Fabricant, Junk Science and the American Criminal Justice System



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite M. to Goodreads.