M. Chris Fabricant
![]() |
Junk Science and the American Criminal Justice System
9 editions
—
published
2022
—
|
|
![]() |
Busted!: Drug War Survival Skills
by
10 editions
—
published
2005
—
|
|
* Note: these are all the books on Goodreads for this author. To add more, click here.
“Scientifically illiterate case law like this obviates the need for rigorous research in forensics. Few traditional forensic techniques have useful applications outside of the justice system and, as a result, once courts allow a technique to be used, there is no real incentive to conduct research—or even test the abilities of putative experts. Why conduct research on a technique that has already been accepted in court, the only place it matters?”
― Junk Science and the American Criminal Justice System
― Junk Science and the American Criminal Justice System
“Essentially, the Marx opinion created an “eyeball test” for in-court evaluation of forensic evidence, shifting the responsibility of exposing flawed expert testimony to defense attorneys—through the “crucible” of cross-examination—and relying on lay jurors to separate science from nonsense.”
― Junk Science and the American Criminal Justice System
― Junk Science and the American Criminal Justice System
“a five-part test to apply before “scientific” evidence can be admitted: 1) the evidence must have a hypothesis that has been (and is capable of) being tested—ipse dixit was out, in other words; 2) there must be peer-reviewed literature demonstrating the technique has been “subject to the scrutiny of the scientific community”; 3) there must be an error rate; 4) practitioners must abide by controlling standards; and 5) in a nod to Frye, acceptance in the scientific community is considered, but no longer controls.”
― Junk Science and the American Criminal Justice System
― Junk Science and the American Criminal Justice System
Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite M. to Goodreads.